A Preliminary Comparative Study of Young's Modulus Versus Shear Modulus in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Wu, Huaiyu [1 ]
Liang, Weiyu [1 ]
Jiao, Yang [1 ]
Song, Hong [1 ]
Peng, Quanzhou [2 ]
Luo, Hui [1 ]
Zhang, Yuanji [1 ]
Xu, Jinfeng [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Fajin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Shenzhen Med Ultrasound Engn Ctr, Dept Ultrasound,Clin Med Coll 2, 1017 Dongmen North Rd, Shenzhen 518020, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
elastic imaging technique; shear modulus; Young's modulus; breast cancer; differential diagnosis; WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; SCREENING US; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASSES;
D O I
10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000434
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of Young's modulus (E) and shear modulus (G) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using sound touch elastography (STE) and to explore the relationship between G and E in breast lesions. Methods A total of 96 consecutive women with 110 pathologically confirmed breast masses were included. All masses were detected by conventional and STE ultrasound. E-mean, E-max, E-min, E-SD, G(mean), G(max), G(min), and G(SD) were determined and evaluated for evidence of significant differences between benign and malignant breast masses. Receiver operator characteristics were used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of E and G and to determine the G cutoff value that would aid in the differential diagnosis of breast cancer. ResultsE(mean), E-max, E-SD, G(mean), G(max), and G(SD) in cases of malignant breast masses were significantly higher than those in cases of benign masses (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between E-min and G(min) (P = 0.565). In applying the E-mean, E-max, E-SD, G(mean), G(max), and G(SD) to the receiver operator characteristics: (1) the area under the curve (AUC) of G(mean) and G(max) is greater than the AUC of E-mean and E-max, and the AUC of E-SD is equal to the AUC of G(SD). (2) The sensitivity and specificity were highest when the G(mean) was 10.14 kPa. They were 84.1% and 80.3% respectively. (3) The sensitivity and specificity were highest when the G(max) was 52.20 kPa. They were 88.6% and 87.9% respectively. Conclusions These preliminary results of STE evaluation of breast masses suggest that the diagnostic value of G is greater than E. Furthermore, STE is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 92
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of in-plane elastic modulus for a hexagonal honeycomb core (2nd report, analysis of young's modulus and shear modulus)
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8601, Japan
    Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu A, 2007, 5 (595-602):
  • [32] On the measurement of Young's modulus
    Cassie, W.
    PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE, 1902, 4 (19-24) : 402 - 410
  • [33] Room temperature Young's modulus, shear modulus, Poisson's ratio and hardness of PbTe-PbS thermoelectric materials
    Ni, Jennifer E.
    Case, Eldon D.
    Khabir, Kristen N.
    Stewart, Ryan C.
    Wu, Chun-I.
    Hogan, Timothy P.
    Timm, Edward J.
    Girard, Steven N.
    Kanatzidis, Mercouri G.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING B-ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL SOLID-STATE MATERIALS, 2010, 170 (1-3): : 58 - 66
  • [34] Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy measurement of Young's modulus, shear modulus and Poisson's ratio as a function of porosity for alumina and hydroxyapatite
    Ren, F.
    Case, E. D.
    Morrison, A.
    Tafesse, M.
    Baumann, M. J.
    PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE, 2009, 89 (14) : 1163 - 1182
  • [35] Comparative study of dynamic and static Young's modulus of concrete containing basaltic aggregates
    Thomaz, William de Araujo
    Miyaji, Dan Yushin
    Possan, Edna
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2021, 15
  • [36] Is a nanorod (or nanotube) with a lower Young’s modulus stiffer? Is not Young’s modulus a stiffness indicator?
    Lim C. W.
    Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy), 2010, (04) : 712 - 724
  • [37] Is a nanorod (or nanotube) with a lower Young’s modulus stiffer? Is not Young’s modulus a stiffness indicator?
    C. W. Lim
    Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2010, 53 : 712 - 724
  • [38] Is a nanorod (or nanotube) with a lower Young's modulus stiffer? Is not Young's modulus a stiffness indicator?
    Lim, C. W.
    SCIENCE CHINA-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY, 2010, 53 (04) : 712 - 724
  • [39] Young's modulus of graphene: A molecular dynamics study
    Jiang, Jin-Wu
    Wang, Jian-Sheng
    Li, Baowen
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2009, 80 (11)
  • [40] Determination of Young's modulus and shear modulus by means of deflection curves for wood beams obtained in static, bending tests
    Murata, Koji
    Kanazawa, Tsubasa
    HOLZFORSCHUNG, 2007, 61 (05) : 589 - 594