Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

被引：0
|
作者：
Wennerholm, U. B. [1 ]
Saltvedt, S. [2 ]
Wessberg, A. [3 ]
Alkmark, M. [1 ]
Bergh, C. [1 ]
Wendel, Brismar S. [4 ]
Fadl, H. [5 ]
Jonsson, M. [6 ]
Ladfors, L. [1 ]
Sengpiel, V [7 ]
Wesstrom, J. [8 ]
Wennergren, G. [9 ]
Wikstrom, A. K. [6 ]
Elden, H. [3 ]
Stephansson, O. [1 ,10 ]
机构：
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol,Inst Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Orebro, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Clin Res Dalarna, Uppsala, Sweden
[9] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci,Dept Paediat, Gothenburg, Sweden
[10] Karolinska Inst, Div Clin Epidemiol, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
来源：
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE | 2020年 / 80卷 / 10期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1055/s-0040-1717166
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
FV007
引用
收藏
页码：E76 / E76
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: protocol for a multicentre prospective, randomised controlled trial
    Walker, K. F.
    Bugg, G.
    Macpherson, M.
    McCormick, C.
    Wildsmith, C.
    Smith, G.
    Thornton, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 495 - 495
  • [42] A randomised open-label trial to assess outpatient induction of labour (HOMEIND) and compare efficacy of Propess vs Dilapan-S® for induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation in normal risk nulliparous women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Nicholson, Sarah M. M.
    Smith, Orla
    Hatt, Susan
    Molphy, Zara
    Dicker, Patrick
    Flood, Karen
    Malone, Fergal
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [43] A randomised open-label trial to assess outpatient induction of labour (HOMEIND) and compare efficacy of Propess vs Dilapan-S® for induction of labour at 39 weeks’ gestation in normal risk nulliparous women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Sarah M. Nicholson
    Orla Smith
    Susan Hatt
    Zara Molphy
    Patrick Dicker
    Karen Flood
    Fergal Malone
    Trials, 24
  • [44] Elective Induction of Labour at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Persons Delivering in a Community Hospital
    Burrows, Adelaide
    Finkenzeller, Kristin
    Pudwell, Jessica
    Smith, Graeme
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2022, 44 (11) : 1159 - 1166
  • [45] The 35/39 trial: a multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial of induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age
    Walker, K. F.
    Bugg, G. J.
    Macpherson, M.
    McCormick, C.
    Wildsmith, C.
    Smith, G. C.
    Thornton, J. G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 5 - 5
  • [46] Postdate pregnancy in nulliparous women: induction of labour at 42 weeks is inefficient - it is time for management change
    Matiluko, A.
    Galimberti, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 104 - 104
  • [47] Induction of labour versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: an economic evaluation
    Gafni, A
    Goeree, R
    Myhr, TL
    Hannah, ME
    Blackhouse, G
    Willan, AR
    Weston, JA
    Wang, EEL
    Hodnett, ED
    Hewson, SA
    Farine, D
    Ohlsson, A
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1997, 157 (11) : 1519 - 1525
  • [48] Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial
    Garabedian, C.
    Tillouche, N.
    Drumez, E.
    Labreuche, J.
    Dreyfus, M.
    Deruelle, P.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 53 (09)
  • [49] Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks - The PPROMEXIL Trial (ISRCTN29313500)
    van der Ham, David P.
    Vijgen, S. M.
    Bijlenga, D.
    Nijhuis, J. G.
    Mulder, T.
    Opmeer, B. C.
    van Beek, J. J.
    Groenewout, M.
    Mantel, G. D.
    Bloemenkam, K. W. M.
    Wijngaarden, M.
    Pernet, P. P.
    Porath, M.
    Molkenboer, J. M.
    Kuppens, S.
    Derks, J. B.
    Kars, M. E.
    Sikkema, M.
    Spaanderman, M.
    Wildschut, H.
    Akerboom, B. M. C.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Willekes, C.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2010, 17 (03) : 210A - 210A
  • [50] Foley Catheterisation Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Hypertensive Women in India (INFORM): A Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial
    Mundle, Shuchita
    Bracken, Hillary
    Khedikar, Vaishali
    Mulik, Jayashree
    Faragher, Brian
    Easterling, Thomas
    Leigh, Simon
    Granby, Paul
    Haycox, Alan
    Turner, Mark A.
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Weeks, Andrew D.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2018, 73 (01) : 3 - 5
12345