Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial

被引：0
|
作者：
Wennerholm, U. B. [1 ]
Saltvedt, S. [2 ]
Wessberg, A. [3 ]
Alkmark, M. [1 ]
Bergh, C. [1 ]
Wendel, Brismar S. [4 ]
Fadl, H. [5 ]
Jonsson, M. [6 ]
Ladfors, L. [1 ]
Sengpiel, V [7 ]
Wesstrom, J. [8 ]
Wennergren, G. [9 ]
Wikstrom, A. K. [6 ]
Elden, H. [3 ]
Stephansson, O. [1 ,10 ]
机构：
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol,Inst Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Orebro, Sweden
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Clin Res Dalarna, Uppsala, Sweden
[9] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci,Dept Paediat, Gothenburg, Sweden
[10] Karolinska Inst, Div Clin Epidemiol, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
来源：
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE | 2020年 / 80卷 / 10期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1055/s-0040-1717166
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
FV007
引用
收藏
页码：E76 / E76
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT-II): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial
    Josje Langenveld
    Kim Broekhuijsen
    Gert-Jan van Baaren
    Maria G van Pampus
    Anton H van Kaam
    Henk Groen
    Martina Porath
    Martijn A Oudijk
    Kitty W Bloemenkamp
    Christianne J de Groot
    Erik van Beek
    Marloes E van Huizen
    Herman P Oosterbaan
    Christine Willekes
    Ella J Wijnen-Duvekot
    Maureen T M Franssen
    Denise A M Perquin
    Jan M J Sporken
    Mallory D Woiski
    Henk A Bremer
    Dimitri N M Papatsonis
    Jozien T J Brons
    Mesruwe Kaplan
    Bas W A Nij Bijvanck
    Ben-Willen J Mol
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11
  • [32] Randomised trial of outpatient induction of labor with vaginal PGE(2) at 40-41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management
    Ohel, G
    Rahav, D
    Rothbart, H
    Ruach, M
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1996, 258 (03) : 109 - 112
  • [33] Outpatient elective induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation (HOME INDUCTION): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase III, non-inferiority trial
    Nicholson, Sarah M.
    Flood, Karen
    Dicker, Patrick
    Molphy, Zara E.
    Smith, Orla T.
    Oprescu, Corina I.
    Wall, Eimear M.
    Nimr, Sara N. El
    Shanahan, Ita M.
    Kennedy, Bernard J.
    V. Daly, Ronan
    Gannon, Geraldine
    Looi, Claudia
    Fernandez, Elena
    Malone, Fergal D.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2024, 74
  • [34] Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review
    Keulen, Judit K. J.
    Bruinsma, Aafke
    Kortekaas, Joep C.
    van Dillen, Jeroen
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    de Miranda, Esteriek
    MIDWIFERY, 2018, 66 : 111 - 118
  • [35] Erratum to: Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT-II): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial
    Kim Broekhuijsen
    Josje Langenveld
    Gert-Jan van Baaren
    Mariëlle G van Pampus
    Anton H van Kaam
    Henk Groen
    Martina Porath
    Maureen TM Franssen
    Ben W Mol
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13
  • [36] Prelabour rupture of membranes at term: Early induction of labour versus expectant management
    Alcalay, M
    Hourvitz, A
    Reichman, B
    Luski, A
    Quint, J
    Barkai, G
    Mashiach, S
    Lipitz, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1996, 70 (02): : 129 - 133
  • [37] Induction of labour versus expectant management for well women and babies in pregnancies extending beyond 41 weeks: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    McKenzie, Ingrid
    Davis, Deborah
    Ferguson, Sally
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2018, 31 : S36 - S36
  • [38] Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial)
    van der Ham D.P.
    Nijhuis J.G.
    Mol B.W.J.
    van Beek J.J.
    Opmeer B.C.
    Bijlenga D.
    Groenewout M.
    Arabin B.
    Bloemenkamp K.W.M.
    van Wijngaarden W.J.
    Wouters M.G.A.J.
    Pernet P.J.M.
    Porath M.M.
    Molkenboer J.F.M.
    Derks J.B.
    Kars M.M.
    Scheepers H.C.J.
    Weinans M.J.N.
    Woiski M.D.
    Wildschut H.I.J.
    Willekes C.
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 7 (1)
  • [39] Induction of labour versus expectant management between 36+0 weeks and 40+6 weeks in twins: A systematic review of literature
    Oliver, Evie
    Navaratnam, Kate
    Sharp, Andrew
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 : 33 - 34
  • [40] Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour after 41+0 weeks compared to expectant management
    Teo, Elaine Yuzhen
    Kumar, Sailesh
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (21): : 2517 - 2520
12345