Effects of Different Kind of Direct Feedback on Students' Writing

被引:2
|
作者
Farid, Saeid [1 ]
Samad, Adlina Abdul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Language Acad, Johor Baharu, Johor, Malaysia
关键词
Error correction; direct feedback; international students' writing;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.265
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
Error feedbacks can help students in their writings and one of these questions is that whether teachers should use or not use error correction and feedbacks in writing classes. This study analyzed the holistic use of verbs considered as errors in the writings of upper intermediate international students studying in University Teknologi Malaysia. This study is a quantitative research with experimental design. Three different treatment groups received three different kinds of direct feedback: Direct feedback with written meta-linguistic explanation, direct feedback with oral meta-linguistic explanation, and direct feedback only. T-test was carried out to identify the effectiveness of each type of direct feedback on errors that had helped the more advanced students improve their writings. The results show that all types of direct feedback were effective but different types of feedback can be ranked in terms of importance. (C) 2012 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the LSP 2012 Committee, Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 239
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Writing in Kind
    Strathern, Marilyn
    [J]. INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2010, 35 (3-4) : 291 - 301
  • [42] Effects of different evaluative feedback on students' self-efficacy in learning
    Chan, Joanne C. Y.
    Lam, Shui-fong
    [J]. INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2010, 38 (01) : 37 - 58
  • [43] Effects of different evaluative feedback on students’ self-efficacy in learning
    Joanne C. Y. Chan
    Shui-fong Lam
    [J]. Instructional Science, 2010, 38 : 37 - 58
  • [44] Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement
    Lu, Qi
    Zhu, Xinhua
    Cheong, Choo Mui
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [45] Feedback in L2 Writing: The Students' Perspective
    Vokic, Gabriela
    [J]. PORTA LINGUARUM, 2008, (09) : 139 - 155
  • [46] Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students' writing
    Steiss, Jacob
    Tate, Tamara
    Graham, Steve
    Cruz, Jazmin
    Hebert, Michael
    Wang, Jiali
    Moon, Youngsun
    Tseng, Waverly
    Warschauer, Mark
    Olson, Carol Booth
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2024, 91
  • [47] Students' Conceptions of Tutor and Automated Feedback in Professional Writing
    Calvo, Rafael A.
    Ellis, Robert A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2010, 99 (04) : 427 - 438
  • [48] Screencasting: supportive feedback for EFL remedial writing students
    Ghosn-Chelala, Maria
    Al-Chibani, Wessam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 35 (03) : 146 - 159
  • [49] Students' Responses to Tutor Feedback: Focusing on Their Writing and Perceptions
    Cho, Sookyung
    Park, Chanho
    [J]. GEMA ONLINE JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2019, 19 (03): : 75 - 87
  • [50] GIVING FEEDBACK ON ASSIGNMENT WRITING TO INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS - THE INTEGRATION OF VOICE AND WRITING TOOLS
    Warner, Richard
    [J]. MEDIA IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2011, 5 : 355 - 381