Obstetrical Unit Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: OUR Study

被引:4
|
作者
Pluym, Ilina D. [1 ]
Rao, Rashmi [1 ]
Ballas, Jerasimos [2 ]
Ramos, Gladys A. [2 ]
Cross, Sarah N. [3 ]
Zapata, Mya [1 ]
Srinivas, Sindhu [4 ]
Louis, Judette M. [5 ]
Werner, Erika [6 ]
Afshar, Yalda [1 ]
Han, Christina S. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[6] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[7] Ctr Fetal Med & Womens Ultrasound, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; personal protective equipment; infection prevention; labor and delivery;
D O I
10.1055/s-0040-1715861
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to describe the response of labor and delivery (L&D) units in the United States to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and determine how institutional characteristics and regional disease prevalence affect viral testing and personal protective equipment (PPE). Study Design A cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically through the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine e-mail database (n = 584 distinct practices) and social media between April 14 and 23, 2020. Participants were recruited through "snowballing." A single representative was asked to respond on behalf of each L&D unit. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable regression was performed to explore characteristics associated with universal testing and PPE usage. Results A total of 301 surveys (estimated 51.5% response rate) was analyzed representing 48 states and two territories. Obstetrical units included academic (31%), community teaching (45%) and nonteaching hospitals (24%). Sixteen percent of respondents were from states with high prevalence, defined as higher "deaths per million" rates compared with the national average. Universal laboratory testing for admissions was reported for 40% (119/297) of units. After adjusting for covariates, universal testing was more common in academic institutions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.42) and high prevalence states (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.37-5.28). When delivering asymptomatic patients, full PPE (including N95 mask) was recommended for vaginal deliveries in 33% and for cesarean delivery in 38% of responding institutions. N95 mask use during asymptomatic vaginal deliveries remained more likely in high prevalence states (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.29-5.09) and less likely in hospitals with universal testing (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73). Conclusion Universal laboratory testing for COVID-19 is more common at academic institutions and in states with high disease prevalence. Centers with universal testing were less likely to recommend N95 masks for asymptomatic vaginal deliveries, suggesting that viral testing can play a role in guiding efficient PPE use.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1309
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A 10-step guide to convert a surgical unit into a COVID-19 unit during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Mari, Giulio M.
    Crippa, Jacopo
    Casciaro, Franco
    Maggioni, Dario
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 78 : 113 - 114
  • [32] Shifting our stance for current COVID-19 outbreaks: A global response to an international pandemic
    Obra, Jed Keenan
    Lin, Bryant
    Palaniappan, Latha
    Kim, Gloria S.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 11
  • [33] The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the geriatric inpatient unit
    Gedik, Tugce Emiroglu
    Unal, Damla
    Suzan, Veysel
    Bag Soytas, Rabia
    Arman, Pinar
    Bektan Kanat, Bahar
    Ulugerger Avci, Gulru
    Suna Erdincler, Deniz
    Doventas, Alper
    Yavuzer, Hakan
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2023, 39 (02) : 259 - 265
  • [34] Prepare the psychiatric inpatient unit for COVID-19 pandemic
    Huang, Mao-Hsuan
    Hung, Chih-Yuan
    Su, Tung-Ping
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 85 (07) : 739 - 740
  • [35] Our Response to COVID-19 as Endocrinologists and Diabetologists
    Kaiser, Ursula B.
    Mirmira, Raghavendra G.
    Stewart, Paul M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2020, 105 (05):
  • [36] Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on obstetrical and gynecologic services in a Greek secondary hospital
    Zacharis, Konstantinos
    Chondros, Spyridon
    Chrysafopoulou, Eleni
    Barbarousi, Asimina
    Tsapadikou, Vasiliki-Kalouda
    Kravvaritis, Stavros
    Fouka, Anastasia
    Charitos, Theodoros
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 293 : 265 - 266
  • [37] Statewide assessment of telehealth use for obstetrical care during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Mallampati, Divya P.
    Talati, Asha N.
    Fitzhugh, Chelsea
    Enayet, Nafiah
    Vladutiu, Catherine J.
    Menard, M. Kathryn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (06)
  • [38] Delivering Community Emergency Medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Physician Response Unit
    Carden, Rich
    Leaning, Bill
    Joy, Tony
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2021, 38 (05) : 371 - 372
  • [39] Obstetrical Outcomes After Implementation of Laborist Model During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Prasannan, Lakha
    Gerber, Rachel
    Gulersen, Moti
    Shan, Weiwei
    Blitz, Matthew J.
    Rochelson, Burton
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2022, 18 (08) : E1243 - E1246
  • [40] Psychosocial response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Panama
    Oviedo, Diana C.
    Pinzon, Maria Sofia
    Rodriguez-Arana, Sofia
    Tratner, Adam E.
    Pauli-Quiros, Elianne
    Chavarria, Carlos
    Rodriguez, Camilo Posada
    Britton, Gabrielle B.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10