Obstetrical Unit Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: OUR Study

被引:4
|
作者
Pluym, Ilina D. [1 ]
Rao, Rashmi [1 ]
Ballas, Jerasimos [2 ]
Ramos, Gladys A. [2 ]
Cross, Sarah N. [3 ]
Zapata, Mya [1 ]
Srinivas, Sindhu [4 ]
Louis, Judette M. [5 ]
Werner, Erika [6 ]
Afshar, Yalda [1 ]
Han, Christina S. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[6] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[7] Ctr Fetal Med & Womens Ultrasound, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; personal protective equipment; infection prevention; labor and delivery;
D O I
10.1055/s-0040-1715861
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to describe the response of labor and delivery (L&D) units in the United States to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and determine how institutional characteristics and regional disease prevalence affect viral testing and personal protective equipment (PPE). Study Design A cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically through the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine e-mail database (n = 584 distinct practices) and social media between April 14 and 23, 2020. Participants were recruited through "snowballing." A single representative was asked to respond on behalf of each L&D unit. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable regression was performed to explore characteristics associated with universal testing and PPE usage. Results A total of 301 surveys (estimated 51.5% response rate) was analyzed representing 48 states and two territories. Obstetrical units included academic (31%), community teaching (45%) and nonteaching hospitals (24%). Sixteen percent of respondents were from states with high prevalence, defined as higher "deaths per million" rates compared with the national average. Universal laboratory testing for admissions was reported for 40% (119/297) of units. After adjusting for covariates, universal testing was more common in academic institutions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.42) and high prevalence states (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.37-5.28). When delivering asymptomatic patients, full PPE (including N95 mask) was recommended for vaginal deliveries in 33% and for cesarean delivery in 38% of responding institutions. N95 mask use during asymptomatic vaginal deliveries remained more likely in high prevalence states (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.29-5.09) and less likely in hospitals with universal testing (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73). Conclusion Universal laboratory testing for COVID-19 is more common at academic institutions and in states with high disease prevalence. Centers with universal testing were less likely to recommend N95 masks for asymptomatic vaginal deliveries, suggesting that viral testing can play a role in guiding efficient PPE use.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1309
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surviving the COVID-19 pandemic: early response of a gynecologic oncology unit in Singapore
    Lim, Yu Hui
    Chay, Wen Yee
    Wong, Wai Loong
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 (06)
  • [22] Requirements for a Bespoke Intensive Care Unit Dashboard in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Semistructured Interview Study
    Davidson, Brittany
    Portillo, Katiuska Mara Ferrer
    Wac, Marceli
    McWilliams, Chris
    Bourdeaux, Christopher
    Craddock, Ian
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 9 (02):
  • [23] Caring for our surgical trainees in the COVID-19 pandemic
    Juanz-Gonzalez, Abelardo
    Leyva-Moraga, Francisco Alberto
    Leyva-Moraga, Eduardo
    Leyva-Moraga, Fernando
    Barreras-Espinoza, Jorge Arturo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (10) : E439 - E439
  • [24] COVID-19 pandemic and nurse teaching: Our experience
    Molina Ruiz, Juan Carlos
    Guerrero Orriach, Jose Luis
    Bravo Arcas, Maria Luisa
    Montilla Sans, Angela
    Escano Gonzalez, Rocio
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (08) : 2657 - 2659
  • [25] What our response to the COVID-19 pandemic tells us of our capacity to respond to climate change
    Gemenne, Francois
    Depoux, Anneliese
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [26] COVID-19 pandemic and nurse teaching: Our experience
    Juan Carlos Molina Ruiz
    Jose Luis Guerrero Orriach
    Maria Luisa Bravo Arcas
    Angela Montilla Sans
    Rocio Escano Gonzalez
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, (08) : 2657 - 2659
  • [27] Medical Toxicology and COVID-19: Our Role in a Pandemic
    Neumann, Natalie R.
    Chai, Peter R.
    Wood, David M.
    Greller, Howard A.
    Mycyk, Mark B.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 16 (03) : 245 - 247
  • [28] THANKS TO OUR SUPPORTERS DURING THIS COVID-19 PANDEMIC
    Purvis, June
    WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW, 2021, 30 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [29] Medical Toxicology and COVID-19: Our Role in a Pandemic
    Natalie R. Neumann
    Peter R. Chai
    David M. Wood
    Howard A. Greller
    Mark B. Mycyk
    Journal of Medical Toxicology, 2020, 16 : 245 - 247
  • [30] A Message to Our Community in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Flotte, Terence R.
    HUMAN GENE THERAPY, 2020, 31 (7-8) : 397 - 397