Obstetrical Unit Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: OUR Study

被引:4
|
作者
Pluym, Ilina D. [1 ]
Rao, Rashmi [1 ]
Ballas, Jerasimos [2 ]
Ramos, Gladys A. [2 ]
Cross, Sarah N. [3 ]
Zapata, Mya [1 ]
Srinivas, Sindhu [4 ]
Louis, Judette M. [5 ]
Werner, Erika [6 ]
Afshar, Yalda [1 ]
Han, Christina S. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[6] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[7] Ctr Fetal Med & Womens Ultrasound, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; personal protective equipment; infection prevention; labor and delivery;
D O I
10.1055/s-0040-1715861
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to describe the response of labor and delivery (L&D) units in the United States to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and determine how institutional characteristics and regional disease prevalence affect viral testing and personal protective equipment (PPE). Study Design A cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically through the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine e-mail database (n = 584 distinct practices) and social media between April 14 and 23, 2020. Participants were recruited through "snowballing." A single representative was asked to respond on behalf of each L&D unit. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable regression was performed to explore characteristics associated with universal testing and PPE usage. Results A total of 301 surveys (estimated 51.5% response rate) was analyzed representing 48 states and two territories. Obstetrical units included academic (31%), community teaching (45%) and nonteaching hospitals (24%). Sixteen percent of respondents were from states with high prevalence, defined as higher "deaths per million" rates compared with the national average. Universal laboratory testing for admissions was reported for 40% (119/297) of units. After adjusting for covariates, universal testing was more common in academic institutions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.42) and high prevalence states (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.37-5.28). When delivering asymptomatic patients, full PPE (including N95 mask) was recommended for vaginal deliveries in 33% and for cesarean delivery in 38% of responding institutions. N95 mask use during asymptomatic vaginal deliveries remained more likely in high prevalence states (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.29-5.09) and less likely in hospitals with universal testing (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73). Conclusion Universal laboratory testing for COVID-19 is more common at academic institutions and in states with high disease prevalence. Centers with universal testing were less likely to recommend N95 masks for asymptomatic vaginal deliveries, suggesting that viral testing can play a role in guiding efficient PPE use.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1309
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The COVID-19 pandemic and its repercussions in our interventional radiology unit
    Cifuentes Garcia, I
    Ariza Molina, C.
    Dominguez Paillacho, I. D.
    Gonzalez-Huebra, I
    Lanciego, C.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2021, 63 (02): : 170 - 179
  • [2] Our Lane in the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Roe, Kathleen M.
    HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (04) : 481 - 483
  • [3] General Guidelines in the Management of an Obstetrical Patient on the Labor and Delivery Unit during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Stephens, Angela J.
    Barton, John R.
    Bentum, Nana-Ama Ankumah
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2020, 37 (08) : 829 - 836
  • [4] The Invisible Damage of the COVID-19 Pandemic to Our Apheresia Unit and the National Economy
    Akyol, Gulsah
    Baydar, Mustafa
    Baysal, Serpil
    Keklik, Muzaffer
    Unal, Ali
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2023, 23 : S475 - S476
  • [5] Our Children Are Not "Behind" Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, but Our Institutional Response Might Be
    Mann, Michael J.
    Smith, Megan L.
    Kristjansson, Alfgeir L.
    Daily, Shay
    McDowell, Shannon
    Traywick, Piper
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2021, 91 (06) : 447 - 450
  • [6] Changes in obstetrical practices during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic
    Gilroy, Laura C.
    Al-Kouatly, Huda B.
    Minkoff, Howard L.
    McLaren, Rodney A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2022, 4 (06)
  • [7] The Impact of Telehealth on Obstetrical Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Saucedo, Alexander M.
    Ceesay, Mamaram
    Ravi, Sanjana
    Mumford, Kelsey
    Alvarez, Miriam
    Ghartey, Jeny
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024,
  • [8] Response to COVID-19 pandemic in India: How can we strengthen our response?
    Kumar, Satish
    Sekhar Reddy, Dandu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (03) : 251 - 255
  • [9] COVID-19 Pandemic - An Apocalypse of Our Time
    Mustafa, Mohammed Imad
    Amjad, Nasser
    IIUM MEDICAL JOURNAL MALAYSIA, 2020, 19 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [10] COVID-19 pandemic and vascular surgery unit
    Yasri, Sora
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (02) : 765 - 765