Psychometric Properties of the Family Communication Scale

被引:10
|
作者
Cracco, Cecilia [1 ,2 ]
Daniel Costa-Ball, Cesar [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Uruguay, Psicol, Comandante Braga 2717, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
[2] Univ Catolica Uruguay, Dept Psicol Clin & Salud, Comandante Braga 2717, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
[3] Univ Catolica Uruguay, Metodol Ciencias Comportamiento & Salud, Comandante Braga 2717, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
[4] Univ Catolica Uruguay, Dept Neurocogn, Comandante Braga 2717, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
关键词
Family Communication Scale; confirmatory factor analysis; psychometric properties; family communication; Circumplex Model; ITEM FACTOR-ANALYSIS; CIRCUMPLEX MODEL; FACES-IV; ADAPTATION; ADAPTABILITY; VALIDATION; COHESION; GUIDE;
D O I
10.21865/RIDEP51.2.06
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Given the growing transcultural interest shown in the Circumplex Model, and considering the need for adapted versions of its scales, the present study analyzes the psychometric properties of the Family Communication Scale (Olson & Barnes, 2010) in the Uruguayan population. The sample was composed of 518 families. We administered a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Family Communication Scale and FACES IV scales. Results from the confirmatory factor analysis showed the unidimensionality of the scale, presenting an adequate index of reliability. Moreover, the correlations with FACES W scales agreed with theoretically based expectations, with the exception of the Enmeshment and Rigid scales. We conclude that the Family Communication Scale presents adequate psychometric properties that make it a valid and reliable technique for the assessment of communication in Uruguayan families.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Work-Family Conflict Scale: Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version
    Loscalzo, Yura
    Raffagnino, Rosalba
    Gonnelli, Claudia
    Giannini, Marco
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [32] PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE FAMILY ALLOCENTRISM-IDIOCENTRISM SCALE WITH SPANISH ADOLESCENTS
    Rodriguez-Menchon, Miriam
    Espada, Jose P.
    Morales, Alexandra
    Orgiles, Mireia
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOLOGY-PSICOLOGIA CONDUCTUAL, 2020, 28 (01): : 59 - 72
  • [33] The psychometric properties of the Arabic version of family Quality of Life Scale (FQOL)
    Alnahdi, Ghaleb
    Schwab, Susanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1233 - 1233
  • [34] Spanish adaptation and psychometric properties of Parenting and Family Adjustment Scale (PAFAS)
    Farina, Francisca
    Seijo, Dolores
    Tome, David
    Castro, Barbara
    [J]. REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA CLINICA CON NINOS Y ADOLESCENTES, 2021, 8 (01): : 40 - 46
  • [35] Psychometric Properties of the Shortened Chinese Version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale
    Yuli Li
    Yang Zhao
    Jie Zhang
    Fenglan Lou
    Fenglin Cao
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2016, 25 : 2710 - 2717
  • [36] Psychometric Properties of the and Scale
    Ray, Robin
    Rayens, Mary Kay
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2024, 53 (01): : 69 - 78
  • [37] A PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE FAMILY ENVIRONMENT SCALE
    LOVELANDCHERRY, CJ
    YOUNGBLUT, JM
    LEIDY, NWK
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 1989, 38 (05) : 262 - &
  • [38] PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE FAMILY EMPOWERMENT SCALE
    SINGH, NN
    CURTIS, WJ
    ELLIS, CR
    NICHOLSON, MW
    VILLANI, TM
    WECHSLER, HA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 1995, 3 (02) : 85 - 91
  • [39] Psychometric properties of the Caregiving Burden Scale for Family Caregivers with Relatives in Nursing Homes: Scale development
    Fukahori, Hiroki
    Yamamoto-Mitani, Noriko
    Sugiyama, Tomoko
    Sugai, Yuichi
    Kai, Ichiro
    [J]. JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE, 2010, 7 (02) : 136 - 147
  • [40] Psychometric Properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): Phase 1
    Cherney, Leora R.
    Babbitt, Edna M.
    Semik, Patrick
    Heinemann, Allen W.
    [J]. TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2011, 18 (04) : 352 - 360