Psychometric Properties of the Shortened Chinese Version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale

被引:12
|
作者
Yuli Li
Yang Zhao
Jie Zhang
Fenglan Lou
Fenglin Cao
机构
[1] Shandong University,School of Nursing
[2] Shandong Medical College,Department of Nursing
来源
关键词
Family theory; Family resiliency; Validity; Reliability; Cross-culture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Family theory has refocused attention from deficits to family strengths, and interest in family resilience across cultures has become more widespread. However, few instruments were designed for quantitative research on family resilience. The Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS) was designed to measure family resilience and has been administered in Western populations. The aim of this study was to adapt the FRAS for use with Chinese populations and examine its psychometric properties. The study was conducted using a sample of 991 university students in China (62.9 % female, mean age 20, SD = 1.12). First, the scale was translated and modified into Chinese, and good language equivalency was found. Next, confirmatory factor analysis was used to identify the best-fitting model. Results showed that the 3-factor model consisting of 32 items was an adequate fit. The goodness-of-fit index values for the model were χ2/df = 5.97, CFI = .84, RMSEA = .08, SRMR = .05. Total scale reliability was α = .95. According to these values it can be said that the modified Chinese version of the FRAS was adapted successfully to the Chinese culture. Moreover, researchers and clinicians can use this instrument to assess family strengths when working with individuals in families experiencing adversity.
引用
收藏
页码:2710 / 2717
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric Properties of the Shortened Chinese Version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale
    Li, Yuli
    Zhao, Yang
    Zhang, Jie
    Lou, Fenglan
    Cao, Fenglin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2016, 25 (09) : 2710 - 2717
  • [2] Psychometric Properties of the Mandarin Version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale
    Shu-Ju Chiu
    Yen-Ting Chou
    Peir-Taur Chen
    Li-Yin Chien
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2019, 28 : 354 - 369
  • [3] Psychometric Properties of the Mandarin Version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale
    Chiu, Shu-Ju
    Chou, Yen-Ting
    Chen, Peir-Taur
    Chien, Li-Yin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2019, 28 (02) : 354 - 369
  • [4] Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Family Awareness Scale
    Shek, DTL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 142 (01): : 61 - 72
  • [5] Measuring family resilience of Chinese family caregivers: Psychometric evaluation of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale
    Chu, Amanda M. Y.
    Tsang, Jenny T. Y.
    Tiwari, Agnes
    Yuk, Helina
    So, Mike K. P.
    [J]. FAMILY RELATIONS, 2022, 71 (01) : 130 - 146
  • [6] Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Ego Resilience scale (ER) and a new shortened version of the Ego Undercontrol Scale (EUC)
    Martina Isaksson
    Ata Ghaderi
    Martina Wolf-Arehult
    Mia Ramklint
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2021, 40 : 1498 - 1506
  • [7] Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Ego Resilience scale (ER) and a new shortened version of the Ego Undercontrol Scale (EUC)
    Isaksson, Martina
    Ghaderi, Ata
    Wolf-Arehult, Martina
    Ramklint, Mia
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 40 (03) : 1498 - 1506
  • [8] Psychometric properties of the composite scale of morningness: a shortened version
    Pornpitakpan, C
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1998, 25 (04) : 699 - 709
  • [9] A psychometric study of the revised Chinese version of the family resilience assessment scale among children disadvantaged due to family migration
    An, Yuanyuan
    Cheng, Xuan
    Yue, Jinming
    Yuan, Guangzhe
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2024, 50 : 115 - 121
  • [10] An assessment of the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Gout Impact Scale
    Pao, Che-Hung
    Ko, Yu
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2020, 36 (01) : 17 - 21