Preoperative nomograms incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer

被引:88
|
作者
Shukla-Dave, Amita [1 ,2 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [2 ]
Akin, Oguz [2 ]
Yu, Changhong [4 ]
Zakian, Kristen L. [1 ,2 ]
Udo, Kazuma [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [3 ]
Eastham, James [3 ]
Kattan, Michael W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Saga Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Saga 840, Japan
[6] Saga Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol & Microbiol, Saga 840, Japan
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; nomograms; prostate neoplasms; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOPSY; MEN; ADENOCARCINOMA; FRAGMENTATION; SUBMISSION; MANAGEMENT; FEATURES; UTILITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10612.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To validate previously published nomograms for predicting insignificant prostate cancer (PCa) that incorporate clinical data, percentage of biopsy cores positive (%BC+) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or MRI/MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) results. We also designed new nomogram models incorporating magnetic resonance results and clinical data without detailed biopsy data. Nomograms for predicting insignificant PCa can help physicians counsel patients with clinically low-risk disease who are choosing between active surveillance and definitive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 181 low-risk PCa patients (clinical stage T1c-T2a, prostate-specific antigen level <10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score of 6) had MRI/MRSI before surgery. For MRI and MRI/MRSI, the probability of insignificant PCa was recorded prospectively and independently by two radiologists on a scale from 0 (definitely insignificant) to 3 (definitely significant PCa). Insignificant PCa was defined on surgical pathology. There were four models incorporating MRI or MRI/MRSI and clinical data with and without %BC+ that were compared with a base clinical model without %BC and a more comprehensive clinical model with %BC+. Prediction accuracy was assessed using areas under receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS At pathology, 27% of patients had insignificant PCa, and the Gleason score was upgraded in 56.4% of patients. For both readers, all magnetic resonance models performed significantly better than the base clinical model (P <= 0.05 for all) and similarly to the more comprehensive clinical model. CONCLUSIONS Existing models incorporating magnetic resonance data, clinical data and %BC+ for predicting the probability of insignificant PCa were validated. All MR-inclusive models performed significantly better than the base clinical model.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1322
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
    Rocco, Bernardo
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (11) : 1624 - 1625
  • [32] Evaluation of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection and Prediction of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Rui
    Wang, He
    Zhao, Chenglin
    Hu, Juan
    Jiang, Yuanyuan
    Tong, Yanjun
    Liu, Ting
    Huang, Rong
    Wang, Xiaoying
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [33] Comparison of three nomograms on clinically insignificant prostate cancer: a validation study
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Diaz, Richilda Red
    Cho, Kang Su
    Ham, Won Sik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 : 22 - 23
  • [34] A comparison of the 10 most frequently used nomograms for the prediction of insignificant prostate carcinoma
    Currlin, E
    Eichelberg, C
    Chun, KHF
    Haese, A
    Steuber, T
    Graefen, M
    Huland, H
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 530 - 530
  • [35] Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer
    S D Heenan
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2004, 7 : 282 - 288
  • [36] Magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer
    Cornud, F.
    Villers, A.
    Mongiat-Artus, P.
    Rebillard, X.
    Soulie, M.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2008, 18 (10): : 621 - 633
  • [37] Added Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Clinical Nomograms for Predicting Adverse Pathology in Prostate Cancer
    Rayn, Kareem N.
    Bloom, Jonathan B.
    Gold, Samuel A.
    Hale, Graham R.
    Baiocco, Joseph A.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Czarniecki, Marcin
    Sabarwal, Vikram K.
    Valera, Vladimir
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Choyke, Peter
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (05): : 1041 - 1047
  • [38] Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer
    Guneyli, Serkan
    Erdem, Cemile Zuhal
    Erdem, Lutfi Oktay
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (04) : 601 - 609
  • [39] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Wong, K. Y. K.
    Chan, C. Y. H.
    Kwok, K. Y.
    Wong, W. K.
    Tang, K. W.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 19 (01): : 64 - 73
  • [40] Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer
    Heenan, SD
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2004, 7 (04) : 282 - 288