Preoperative nomograms incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer

被引:88
|
作者
Shukla-Dave, Amita [1 ,2 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [2 ]
Akin, Oguz [2 ]
Yu, Changhong [4 ]
Zakian, Kristen L. [1 ,2 ]
Udo, Kazuma [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [3 ]
Eastham, James [3 ]
Kattan, Michael W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Saga Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Saga 840, Japan
[6] Saga Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol & Microbiol, Saga 840, Japan
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; nomograms; prostate neoplasms; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOPSY; MEN; ADENOCARCINOMA; FRAGMENTATION; SUBMISSION; MANAGEMENT; FEATURES; UTILITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10612.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To validate previously published nomograms for predicting insignificant prostate cancer (PCa) that incorporate clinical data, percentage of biopsy cores positive (%BC+) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or MRI/MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) results. We also designed new nomogram models incorporating magnetic resonance results and clinical data without detailed biopsy data. Nomograms for predicting insignificant PCa can help physicians counsel patients with clinically low-risk disease who are choosing between active surveillance and definitive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 181 low-risk PCa patients (clinical stage T1c-T2a, prostate-specific antigen level <10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score of 6) had MRI/MRSI before surgery. For MRI and MRI/MRSI, the probability of insignificant PCa was recorded prospectively and independently by two radiologists on a scale from 0 (definitely insignificant) to 3 (definitely significant PCa). Insignificant PCa was defined on surgical pathology. There were four models incorporating MRI or MRI/MRSI and clinical data with and without %BC+ that were compared with a base clinical model without %BC and a more comprehensive clinical model with %BC+. Prediction accuracy was assessed using areas under receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS At pathology, 27% of patients had insignificant PCa, and the Gleason score was upgraded in 56.4% of patients. For both readers, all magnetic resonance models performed significantly better than the base clinical model (P <= 0.05 for all) and similarly to the more comprehensive clinical model. CONCLUSIONS Existing models incorporating magnetic resonance data, clinical data and %BC+ for predicting the probability of insignificant PCa were validated. All MR-inclusive models performed significantly better than the base clinical model.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1322
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of pretherapeutic criterias and nomograms for identifying insignificant prostate cancer
    Arndt, B.
    Boudny, P.
    Herfs, G.
    Kwiatkowski, M.
    Shen, H.
    Seiler, D.
    Recker, F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 49 - 49
  • [22] Insignificant prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimen: Time trends and preoperative prediction
    Augustin, H
    Hammerer, PG
    Graefen, M
    Erbersdobler, A
    Blonski, J
    Palisaar, J
    Daghofer, F
    Huland, H
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (05) : 455 - 460
  • [23] The significance of the visible tumor on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer
    Shin, Teak Jun
    Jung, Wonho
    Ha, Ji Yong
    Kim, Byung Hoon
    Kim, Young Hwan
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 9 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [24] Application value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Zhang, Tianhe
    Zhou, Zhiyong
    Li, Wuxue
    Xu, Changbao
    Zhao, Shuailin
    Wei, Haiyang
    Huang, Zhiheng
    Zhao, Xinghua
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [25] Metabolomic imaging of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry
    Eva-Margarete Spur
    Emily A. Decelle
    Leo L. Cheng
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2013, 40 : 60 - 71
  • [26] Metabolomic imaging of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry
    Spur, Eva-Margarete
    Decelle, Emily A.
    Cheng, Leo L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S60 - S71
  • [27] Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Prostate Cancer
    Kurhanewicz, John
    Vigneron, Daniel B.
    EMAGRES, 2016, 5 (01): : 923 - 943
  • [28] Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer
    Huzjan, R
    Sala, E
    Hricak, H
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2005, 2 (09): : 434 - 442
  • [29] Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer
    Renata Huzjan
    Evis Sala
    Hedvig Hricak
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2005, 2 : 434 - 442
  • [30] Value of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of cancer prostate
    Afifi, Ahmad Hafez Ahmad Alsayed
    Etaby, Ashraf Naguib
    Ahmad, Mohamad Alsayed Yousef
    Farghaly, Yasmin Tarek
    ALEXANDRIA JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 49 (01) : 57 - 66