Comparison of paper-pencil and online performances of students with learning disabilities

被引:7
|
作者
Taherbhai, Husein
Seo, Daeryong
Bowman, Trinell
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01411926.2010.526193
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Literature in the United States provides many examples of no difference in student achievement when measured against the mode of test administration i.e., paper-pencil and online versions of the test. However, most of these researches centre on 'regular' students who do not require differential teaching methods or different evaluation processes and techniques. This research provides evidence that students who have learning disabilities, like their counterparts in the regular educational programme, do not lag behind in computer adaptation and use. The study, using differential item functioning analysis with an 'external' variable and an analysis of covariance, shows that items and tests can be created to have no practical differences in the mode of administration for this special group of students, and as such, is in keeping with the trend for using online testing with its many advantages (cost savings, flexibility in administration, etc.) in lieu of the paper and pencil version of the test.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 74
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Synthesis of Mathematical and Cognitive Performances of Students With Mathematics Learning Disabilities
    Shin, Mikyung
    Bryant, Diane Pedrotty
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2015, 48 (01) : 96 - 112
  • [42] Comparison of Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Problem Posing Abilities in Paper-Pencil Test and on Dynamic Geometry Environment in Terms of Creativity
    Ocal, Mehmet Fatih
    Kar, Tugrul
    Guler, Gursel
    Ipek, Ali Sabri
    REDIMAT-REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EN DIDACTICA DE LAS MATEMATICAS, 2020, 9 (03): : 243 - 272
  • [43] PAPER-PENCIL TESTS FOR RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PRIMARY HEADACHES ON THE BASIS OF THE IHS CRITERIA
    GOBEL, H
    HEADACHE, 1994, 34 (10): : 564 - 568
  • [44] CHEMICAL EDUCATION AND PIAGET - NEW PAPER-PENCIL INVENTORY TO ASSESS COGNITIVE-FUNCTIONING
    MILAKOFSKY, L
    PATTERSON, HO
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1979, 56 (02) : 87 - 90
  • [45] Electronic versus paper-pencil methods for assessing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
    Robert Knoerl
    Evan Gray
    Carrie Stricker
    Sandra A. Mitchell
    Kelsey Kippe
    Gloria Smith
    William N. Dudley
    Ellen M. Lavoie Smith
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017, 25 : 3437 - 3446
  • [46] PSYCHOMETRIC COMPARISON OF PAPER-AND-PENCIL AND ONLINE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENTS IN A SELECTION SETTING
    Joubert, Tina
    Kriek, Hendrik J.
    SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 35 (01) : 78 - 88
  • [47] Electronic versus paper-pencil methods for assessing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
    Knoerl, Robert
    Gray, Evan
    Stricker, Carrie
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Kippe, Kelsey
    Smith, Gloria
    Dudley, William N.
    Smith, Ellen M. Lavoie
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (11) : 3437 - 3446
  • [48] Computerized versus paper-pencil based experience sampling of daily mood: An analysis of reactivity
    Schwenkmezger, P
    Hank, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 1455 - 1455
  • [49] Selection of Graphite Pencil Grades for the Design of Suitable Electrodes for Stacking Multiple Single-Inlet Paper-Pencil Fuel Cells
    Arun, Ravi Kumar
    Gupta, Vinay
    Singh, Preeti
    Biswas, Gautam
    Chanda, Nripen
    CHEMISTRYSELECT, 2019, 4 (01): : 152 - 159
  • [50] Test-Retest Reliability of a Group-Administered Paper-Pencil Measure of Delay Discounting
    Beck, Robert C.
    Triplett, Mary Frances
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 17 (05) : 345 - 355