Comparison of paper-pencil and online performances of students with learning disabilities

被引:7
|
作者
Taherbhai, Husein
Seo, Daeryong
Bowman, Trinell
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01411926.2010.526193
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Literature in the United States provides many examples of no difference in student achievement when measured against the mode of test administration i.e., paper-pencil and online versions of the test. However, most of these researches centre on 'regular' students who do not require differential teaching methods or different evaluation processes and techniques. This research provides evidence that students who have learning disabilities, like their counterparts in the regular educational programme, do not lag behind in computer adaptation and use. The study, using differential item functioning analysis with an 'external' variable and an analysis of covariance, shows that items and tests can be created to have no practical differences in the mode of administration for this special group of students, and as such, is in keeping with the trend for using online testing with its many advantages (cost savings, flexibility in administration, etc.) in lieu of the paper and pencil version of the test.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 74
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Making Online Learning Accessible for Students With Disabilities
    Hashey, Andrew, I
    Stahl, Skip
    TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2014, 46 (05) : 70 - 78
  • [32] Evaluation of the usefulness of a paper-pencil group cognitive assessment for older adults in the community
    Cho, Daisuke
    Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    Ogawa, Susumu
    Takahashi, Tomoya
    Sato, Kenichiro
    Iizuka, Ai
    Kobayashi, Momoko
    Yamauchi, Misako
    Kinai, Anna
    Li, Yan
    Fujiwara, Yoshinori
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [33] Designing Online Learning Opportunities for Students with Disabilities
    Smith, Sean J.
    Basham, James D.
    TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2014, 46 (05) : 127 - 137
  • [34] Online Learning for Students with Disabilities: A Framework for Success
    Cavanaugh, Cathy
    Repetto, Jeanne
    Wayer, Nicola
    Spitler, Carrie
    JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 28 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [35] Designing Online Learning to be Accessible to Students with Disabilities
    Burgstahler, Sheryl
    IEEE STCBP RESPECT CONFERENCE: 2021 RESEARCH ON EQUITY AND SUSTAINED PARTICIPATION IN ENGINEERING, COMPUTING, AND TECHNOLOGY (RESPECT), 2021, : 255 - 256
  • [36] Comparison between a Paper-Pencil Version and Computerized Version for the Realization of a Neuropsychological Test: The Example of the Trail Making Test
    Sacco, Guillaume
    Ben-Sadoun, Gregory
    Bourgeois, Jeremy
    Fabre, Roxane
    Manera, Valeria
    Robert, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2019, 68 (04) : 1657 - 1666
  • [37] Pencil-Paper Learning Should Be Combined with Online Homework Software
    Smithrud, David B.
    Pinhas, Allan R.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 92 (12) : 1965 - 1970
  • [39] THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF PAPER-PENCIL TEST, INTERVIEW, AND RATINGS AS TECHNIQUES FOR PERSONALITY EVALUATION
    Jackson, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1946, 23 (01): : 35 - 54
  • [40] Validation and Comparison of a Digital Digit Symbol Substitution (DSST) Task Performed on Smart Phones With a Traditional Paper-Pencil Version
    Allen, Luke
    Baker, Elizabeth
    Thorp, Emily
    Evans, Miriam
    Thorpe, Daniel
    Granger, Kiri
    Cormack, Francesca
    Barnett, Jenny
    Cashdollar, Nathan
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 89 (09) : S132 - S133