Comparison of paper-pencil and online performances of students with learning disabilities

被引:7
|
作者
Taherbhai, Husein
Seo, Daeryong
Bowman, Trinell
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01411926.2010.526193
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Literature in the United States provides many examples of no difference in student achievement when measured against the mode of test administration i.e., paper-pencil and online versions of the test. However, most of these researches centre on 'regular' students who do not require differential teaching methods or different evaluation processes and techniques. This research provides evidence that students who have learning disabilities, like their counterparts in the regular educational programme, do not lag behind in computer adaptation and use. The study, using differential item functioning analysis with an 'external' variable and an analysis of covariance, shows that items and tests can be created to have no practical differences in the mode of administration for this special group of students, and as such, is in keeping with the trend for using online testing with its many advantages (cost savings, flexibility in administration, etc.) in lieu of the paper and pencil version of the test.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 74
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Online adaptive versus paper-pencil testing
    Molnar, Gyongyver
    Csapo, Ben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 729 - 729
  • [2] Students' thinking preferences in solving mathematics problems based on learning styles: a comparison of paper-pencil and geogebra
    Farihah, Umi
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMBINATORICS, GRAPH THEORY, AND NETWORK TOPOLOGY, 2018, 1008
  • [3] Performance and duration differences between online and paper-pencil tests
    Bayazit, Alper
    Askar, Petek
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, 2012, 13 (02) : 219 - 226
  • [4] Validity and Reliability Study of Teacher Professional Motivation Scale: A Comparison of Online and Paper-Pencil Administration
    Karabag Kose, Esra
    Karatas, Erdem
    Kucukcene, Mehmet
    Tas, Ali
    [J]. PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2021, (51): : 479 - 498
  • [5] Comparison of two test methods for VIS: paper-pencil test and CAT
    Senel, Selma
    Kutlu, Omer
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION, 2018, 33 (05) : 631 - 645
  • [6] Speeded Paper-Pencil Sustained Attention and Mental Speed Tests Can Performances Be Discriminated?
    Krumm, Stefan
    Schmidt-Atzert, Lothar
    Michalczyk, Kurt
    Danthiir, Vanessa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 29 (04) : 205 - 216
  • [7] Students' results comparison in online vs. paper and pencil chemistry assessment
    Prisacari, Anna A.
    Holme, Thomas
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 241
  • [8] INVESTIGATING STUDENTS ATTITUDES TOWARD COMPUTER- BASED AND TRADITIONAL PAPER-PENCIL TESTING
    Albanna, N.
    Abu-Safe, H.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2019), 2019, : 9668 - 9678
  • [9] Hungarian Validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) Method Effects and Comparison of Paper-Pencil Versus Online Administration
    Pajkossy, Peter
    Simor, Peter
    Szendi, Istvan
    Racsmany, Mihaly
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2015, 31 (03) : 159 - 165
  • [10] The synergy of students' use of paper-pencil techniques and geogebra in solving analytical geometry problems
    Farihah, U.
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMBINATORICS, GRAPH THEORY, AND NETWORK TOPOLOGY, 2019,