From ultimatum to Nash bargaining:: Theory and experimental evidence

被引:16
|
作者
Fischer, S [1 ]
Güth, W
Müller, W
Stiehler, A
机构
[1] Univ Karlsruhe, Inst Wirtschaftstheorie & Operat Res, D-78128 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Res Econ Syst, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Econ, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
commitment; imperfect observability; ultimatum bargaining; Nash bargaining; experiments;
D O I
10.1007/s10683-006-1468-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider a sequential two-party bargaining game with uncertain information transmission. When the first mover states her demand she does only know the probability with which the second mover will be informed about it. The informed second mover can either accept or reject the offer and payoffs are determined as in the ultimatum game. Otherwise the uninformed second mover states his own demand and payoffs are determined as in the Nash demand game. In the experiment we vary the commonly known probability of information transmission. Our main finding is that first movers' and uninformed second movers' demands adjust to this probability as qualitatively predicted, that is, first movers' (uninformed second movers') demands are lower (higher) the lower the probability of information transmission.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 33
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining
    Boles, TL
    Croson, RTA
    Murnighan, JK
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 83 (02) : 235 - 259
  • [42] An experiment with ultimatum bargaining in a changing environment
    Winter, E
    Zamir, S
    [J]. JAPANESE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 56 (03) : 363 - 385
  • [43] Personality influences on ultimatum bargaining decisions
    Brandstätter, H
    Königstein, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2001, 15 : S53 - S70
  • [44] An experiment on ultimatum bargaining and testing on the differences
    Lu, Wan-bo
    Li, Zhu-yu
    Heike, Hennig-Schmidt
    [J]. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Game Theory and Applications, 2007, : 130 - 134
  • [45] ON ULTIMATUM BARGAINING EXPERIMENTS - A PERSONAL REVIEW
    GUTH, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1995, 27 (03) : 329 - 344
  • [46] ANONYMITY VERSUS PUNISHMENT IN ULTIMATUM BARGAINING
    BOLTON, GE
    ZWICK, R
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) : 95 - 121
  • [47] Is an Ultimatum the Last Word on Crisis Bargaining?
    Fey, Mark
    Kenkel, Brenton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2021, 83 (01): : 87 - 102
  • [48] Ultimatum salary bargaining with real effort
    Garcia-Gallego, Aurora
    Georgantzis, Nikolaos
    Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Ainhoa
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 98 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [49] Subgame perfection in ultimatum bargaining trees
    Stahl, Dale O.
    Haruvy, Ernan
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2008, 63 (01) : 292 - 307
  • [50] EXPERIMENTAL GAMES AND BARGAINING THEORY
    SCHELLING, TC
    [J]. WORLD POLITICS, 1961, 14 (01) : 47 - 68