Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study

被引:52
|
作者
Csifcsak, Gabor [1 ]
Boayue, Nya Mehnwolo [1 ]
Puonti, Oula [2 ,3 ]
Thielscher, Axel [2 ,3 ]
Mittner, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Psychol, Tromso, Norway
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn, Ctr Magnet Resonance, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Hvidovre, Ctr Funct & Diagnost Imaging & Res, Danish Res Ctr Magnet Resonance, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Depression; Computational modeling; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Medial prefrontal cortex; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; MAJOR DEPRESSION; COGNITIVE-CONTROL; ELECTRIC-FIELD; DOUBLE-BLIND; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CONTROLLED TRIAL; CURRENT THERAPY; DC STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.077
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) above the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) has been widely used to improve symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the effects of different stimulation protocols in the entire frontal lobe have not been investigated in a large sample including patient data. Methods: We used 38 head models created from structural magnetic resonance imaging data of 19 healthy adults and 19 MDD patients and applied computational modeling to simulate the spatial distribution of tDCS-induced electric fields (EFs) in 20 frontal regions. We evaluated effects of seven bipolar and two multi-electrode 4 x 1 tDCS protocols. Results: For bipolar montages, EFs were of comparable strength in the lDLPFC and in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). Depending on stimulation parameters, EF cortical maps varied to a considerable degree, but were found to be similar in controls and patients. 4 x 1 montages produced more localized, albeit weaker effects. Limitations: White matter anisotropy was not modeled. The relationship between EF strength and clinical response to tDCS could not be evaluated. Conclusions: In addition to lDLPFC stimulation, excitability changes in the MPFC should also be considered as a potential mechanism underlying clinical efficacy of bipolar montages. MDD-associated anatomical variations are not likely to substantially influence current flow. Individual modeling of tDCS protocols can substantially improve cortical targeting. We make recommendations for future research to explicitly test the contribution of lDLPFC vs. MPFC stimulation to therapeutic outcomes of tDCS in this disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Ruibin
    Lam, Charlene L. M.
    Peng, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Dongming
    Zhang, Chichen
    Huang, Ruiwang
    Lee, Tatia M. C.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2021, 126 : 481 - 490
  • [42] Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treating Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review
    Marlow, Nicole M.
    Bonilha, Heather S.
    Short, E. Baron
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2013, 13 (02) : 131 - 145
  • [43] Subcortical effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in the rat
    Bolzoni, F.
    Baczyk, M.
    Jankowska, E.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (16): : 4027 - 4042
  • [44] The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pragmatic processing
    Osovlanski, Hagit
    Mashal, Nira
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2017, 44 : 239 - 248
  • [45] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects in Disorders of Consciousness
    Angelakis, Efthymios
    Liouta, Evangelia
    Andreadis, Nikos
    Korfias, Stephanos
    Ktonas, Periklis
    Stranjalis, George
    Sakas, Damianos E.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (02): : 283 - 289
  • [46] Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Woods, Adam J.
    Bryant, Vaughn
    Sacchetti, Daniela
    Gervits, Felix
    Hamilton, Roy
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (03) : 515 - 519
  • [47] Transcranial direct current stimulation
    Fregni, F
    Boggio, PS
    Nitsche, PS
    Pascual-Leone, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 186 : 446 - 447
  • [48] The effects of repeated transcranial direct current stimulation on sleep quality and depression symptoms in patients with major depression and insomnia
    Zhou, Qi
    Yu, Chang
    Yu, Haihang
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Liu, Zhiwang
    Hu, Zhenyu
    Yuan, Ti-Fei
    Zhou, Dongsheng
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2020, 70 : 17 - 26
  • [49] Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for Treatment-Resistant Depression Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Boscutti, Andrea
    De Figueiredo, Juliana Mendonca
    Razouq, Dana
    Murphy, Nicholas
    Cho, Raymond
    Selvaraj, Sudhakar
    PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 46 (02) : 307 - 329
  • [50] Astrocytes as a target of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to treat depression
    Monai, Hiromu
    Hirase, Hajime
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2018, 126 : 15 - 21