Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study

被引:52
|
作者
Csifcsak, Gabor [1 ]
Boayue, Nya Mehnwolo [1 ]
Puonti, Oula [2 ,3 ]
Thielscher, Axel [2 ,3 ]
Mittner, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Psychol, Tromso, Norway
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn, Ctr Magnet Resonance, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Hvidovre, Ctr Funct & Diagnost Imaging & Res, Danish Res Ctr Magnet Resonance, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Depression; Computational modeling; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Medial prefrontal cortex; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; MAJOR DEPRESSION; COGNITIVE-CONTROL; ELECTRIC-FIELD; DOUBLE-BLIND; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CONTROLLED TRIAL; CURRENT THERAPY; DC STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.077
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) above the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) has been widely used to improve symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the effects of different stimulation protocols in the entire frontal lobe have not been investigated in a large sample including patient data. Methods: We used 38 head models created from structural magnetic resonance imaging data of 19 healthy adults and 19 MDD patients and applied computational modeling to simulate the spatial distribution of tDCS-induced electric fields (EFs) in 20 frontal regions. We evaluated effects of seven bipolar and two multi-electrode 4 x 1 tDCS protocols. Results: For bipolar montages, EFs were of comparable strength in the lDLPFC and in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). Depending on stimulation parameters, EF cortical maps varied to a considerable degree, but were found to be similar in controls and patients. 4 x 1 montages produced more localized, albeit weaker effects. Limitations: White matter anisotropy was not modeled. The relationship between EF strength and clinical response to tDCS could not be evaluated. Conclusions: In addition to lDLPFC stimulation, excitability changes in the MPFC should also be considered as a potential mechanism underlying clinical efficacy of bipolar montages. MDD-associated anatomical variations are not likely to substantially influence current flow. Individual modeling of tDCS protocols can substantially improve cortical targeting. We make recommendations for future research to explicitly test the contribution of lDLPFC vs. MPFC stimulation to therapeutic outcomes of tDCS in this disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanisms and Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Giordano, James
    Bikson, Marom
    Kappenman, Emily S.
    Clark, Vincent P.
    Coslett, H. Branch
    Hamblin, Michael R.
    Hamilton, Roy
    Jankord, Ryan
    Kozumbo, Walter J.
    McKinley, R. Andrew
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Reilly, J. Patrick
    Richardson, Jessica
    Wurzman, Rachel
    Calabrese, Edward
    DOSE-RESPONSE, 2017, 15 (01):
  • [22] A Review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Medication and Psychotherapy for Depression
    Kochanowski, Brian
    Kageki-Bonnert, Karina
    Pinkerton, Elizabeth A.
    Dougherty, Darin D.
    Chou, Tina
    HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 32 (03) : 77 - 95
  • [23] Transcranial alternating current stimulation for treating depression: a randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Hongxing
    Wang, Kun
    Xue, Qing
    Peng, Mao
    Yin, Lu
    Gu, Xuecun
    Leng, Haixia
    Lu, Juan
    Liu, Hongzhi
    Wang, Di
    Xiao, Jin
    Sun, Zhichao
    Li, Ning
    Dong, Kai
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhan, Shuqin
    Fan, Chunqiu
    Min, Baoquan
    Zhou, Aihong
    Xie, Yunyan
    Song, Haiqing
    Ye, Jing
    Liu, Aihua
    Gao, Ran
    Huang, Liyuan
    Jiao, Lidong
    Song, Yang
    Dong, Huiqing
    Tian, Zichen
    Si, Tianmei
    Zhang, Xiangyang
    Li, Xinmin
    Kamiya, Atsushi
    Cosci, Fiammetta
    Gao, Keming
    Wang, Yuping
    BRAIN, 2022, 145 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [24] Transcranial direct current stimulation: A new tool for the treatment of depression?
    Arul-Anandam, Abraham P.
    Loo, Colleen
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2009, 117 (03) : 137 - 145
  • [25] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Considerations for Research in Adolescent Depression
    Lee, Jonathan C.
    Lewis, Charles P.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Croarkin, Paul E.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 8
  • [26] Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A Review
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2009, 219 (01) : 14 - 19
  • [27] Mood and cognitive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke depression
    Bueno, Viviane F.
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Bensenor, Isabela M.
    Fregni, Felipe
    NEUROCASE, 2011, 17 (04) : 318 - 322
  • [28] Amelioration of Cognitive Control in Depression by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Wolkenstein, Larissa
    Plewnia, Christian
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 73 (07) : 646 - 651
  • [29] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Treatment for Depression in the Hemodialysis Setting
    Bautovich, Alison
    Loo, Colleen
    Katz, Ivor
    Martin, Donel
    Harvey, Samuel
    PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2016, 57 (03) : 305 - 309
  • [30] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Depression and Psychosis: A Systematic Review
    Yokoi, Yuma
    Narita, Zui
    Sumiyoshi, Tomiki
    CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 49 (02) : 93 - 102