The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology

被引:70
|
作者
Pike, Kate [1 ]
Wright, Paul [1 ]
Wink, Brian [1 ]
Fletcher, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Southampton Solent Univ, Southampton SO14 OYN, Hants, England
[2] Univ Plymouth, Ctr Marine & Coastal Policy, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
Ecosystem services; Q methodology; Marine protected areas; Cultural value; Chichester Harbour; Pacific Rim National Park; PROTECTED AREAS; SOCIAL VALUE; CONSERVATION; TYPOLOGY; ENGLAND; WALES;
D O I
10.1007/s11852-014-0350-z
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Cultural ecosystem services are generally understood to be the non-material value that can be gained through ecosystems such as a sense of well-being, reflection and spiritual enhancement. These are often linked with a sense of place, culture, heritage and identity. The assessment of cultural ecosystem services, particularly in the marine environment is an inherently complex and difficult task, because they often involve making value judgments which can be hard to quantify. Methods applied to determining the value of these services are often focused on their financial value. Whilst methodologies have been developed to assess the non-material importance of these services, this paper argues that Q methodology provides a highly appropriate way of examining unmeasurable values by being able to convert qualitative, subjective data into quantitative information. The research presents two data sets derived from Q methodology which examined stakeholder views of the cultural values from two marine protected areas; the Pacific Rim National Park, Vancouver Island, Canada and an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in Chichester Harbour, UK. The relevance of using Q methodology as a valuation mechanism in this type of study is examined and justified; whilst highlighting the advantages of tackling a subject of values and intangibility, highly qualitative information, with a structured, semi-automated and primarily quantitative methodology. The findings show that the case-study areas hold three predominant 'factors' of value for its stake holders. These include the protected areas; as a place of care for each other and oneself through the natural world; a place of spirituality; and as a place of freedom and refuge. The paper strongly argues for the use of Q methodology in such a study, which ultimately helps to bring about a depth of information that arguably traditional methods are incapable of in the same capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 675
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating the provision of ecosystem services and trawl fisheries for the management of the marine environment
    Muntadas, Alba
    de Juan, Silvia
    Demestre, Montserrat
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 506 : 594 - 603
  • [32] Mapping cultural ecosystem services in the hyper arid environment of south of Jordan
    Albalawneh, Abeer
    Al-Assaf, Amani
    Sweity, Amer
    Abu Hammour, Wafa'a
    Kloub, Khawla
    Hjazin, Amgad
    Kabariti, Rabab
    Abu Nowar, Lana
    Tadros, Maher J.
    Aljaafreh, Safaa
    Diab, Mai
    Alwidyan, Jafar
    Albashbsheh, Ghadeer
    Haddad, Nizar
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [33] Using ecosystem services mapping for marine spatial planning in southern Chile under scenario assessment
    Outeiro, Luis
    Haeussermann, Vreni
    Viddi, Francisco
    Hucke-Gaete, Rodrigo
    Foersterra, Guenter
    Oyarzo, Hugo
    Kosiel, Klaus
    Villasante, Sebastian
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 16 : 341 - 353
  • [34] Using image recognition to automate assessment of cultural ecosystem services from social media photographs
    Richards, Daniel R.
    Tuncer, Bige
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 31 : 318 - 325
  • [35] A pathway to identifying and valuing cultural ecosystem services: An application to marine food webs
    Baulcomb, Corinne
    Fletcher, Ruth
    Lewis, Amy
    Akoglu, Ekin
    Robinson, Leonie
    von Almen, Amanada
    Hussain, Salman
    Glenk, Klaus
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 11 : 128 - 139
  • [36] Assessment of Society's Perceptions on Cultural Ecosystem Services in a Cultural Landscape in Nanchang, China
    Kang, Ning
    Xie, Guanhong
    Liu, Chunqing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [37] Valuing Cultural Ecosystem Services
    Hirons, Mark
    Comberti, Claudia
    Dunford, Robert
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 41, 2016, 41 : 545 - 574
  • [38] Managing cultural ecosystem services
    Pleasant, Mary M.
    Gray, Steven A.
    Lepczyk, Christopher
    Fernandes, Anthea
    Hunter, Nathan
    Ford, Derek
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 8 : 141 - 147
  • [39] Status of mapping, assessment and valuation of marine ecosystem services in the European seas
    Addamo, Anna Maria
    La Notte, Alessandra
    Guillen, Jordi
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 67
  • [40] Assessment and prioritization of cultural ecosystem services in the Sahara-Sahelian region
    Santarem, Frederico
    Saarinen, Jarkko
    Brito, Jose Carlos
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 777 (777)