Assessment of Society's Perceptions on Cultural Ecosystem Services in a Cultural Landscape in Nanchang, China

被引:7
|
作者
Kang, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Guanhong [1 ]
Liu, Chunqing [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Agr Univ, Coll Landscape Architecture & Art, Nanchang 330045, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Normal Univ, Coll Fine Arts, Huangshi 435002, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Rural Culture Dev Res Ctr, Nanchang 330045, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
landscape experience; landscape assessment; cultural landscape; ecosystem services; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/su151310308
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ancient villages are a unique landscape of cultural heritage with both tangible and intangible culture, which provide rich ecosystem services for human beings. Assessment of society's perceptions on cultural heritage landscapes can improve the integration of cultural heritage values into decision-making processes that affect landscapes, thereby contributing to maximizing the benefits people receive from cultural ecosystem services. Based on this premise, a new sense-based hierarchical assessment framework for a cultural landscape of ancient villages in China from the perspectives of experts and the public was developed in this study. Field research was conducted by the experts to preliminarily extract the evaluation indicators by identifying and refining the characteristics of the landscape perception units based on the classification of village's landscape resources. The public indicators as supplements were determined by the semantic and social networks generated with ROSTCM tool post-processing, which followed crawling public comments on the tourism platforms with Python. The findings indicated that visual stimulation (57.36%) is the strongest, while touch perception is the weakest (3.56%). The proportion of hearing, smell, and taste was 21.52%, 12.05%, and 5.53%, respectively. Furthermore, people consider variety, historicity, culture, and localism as the core themes of perception in their landscape experiences. The value and usefulness of the sensory experiences for cultural landscape assessment and for decision-making in the context of cultural ecosystem services are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape
    Piras, Francesco
    Fiore, Beatrice
    Santoro, Antonio
    LAND, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [2] Linking Ecosystem Services with Cultural Landscape Research
    Schaich, Harald
    Bieling, Claudia
    Plieninger, Tobias
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2010, 19 (04): : 269 - 277
  • [3] Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape
    Bieling, Claudia
    Plieninger, Tobias
    LANDSCAPE RESEARCH, 2013, 38 (05) : 649 - 667
  • [4] Effectively enhancing perceptions of cultural ecosystem services: A case study of a karst cultural ecosystem
    Nie, Xin
    Wang, Qiaoling
    Wu, Jianxian
    Wang, Han
    Chen, Zhoupeng
    He, Jiaxin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 315
  • [5] Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Critical Assessment
    James, Simon P.
    ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 18 (03) : 338 - 350
  • [6] Making Intangibles Tangible: Identifying Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a Cultural Landscape
    Jiang, Wei
    Marggraf, Rainer
    LAND, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [7] The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context
    Csurgo, Bernadett
    Smith, Melanie K.
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 86 : 76 - 86
  • [8] Intangible Bonds: Cultural Ecosystem Services and Landscape Practices
    Wen, Chen
    Xu, Haiyun
    Plieninger, Tobias
    LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FRONTIERS, 2022, 10 (05) : 4 - 7
  • [9] Cultural ecosystem and cultural landscape momposino
    Leal del Castillo, Gabriel Enrique
    Gaviria Valenzuela, Andres
    Osorio Guzman, Ana Maria
    CUADERNOS DE VIVIENDA Y URBANISMO, 2013,
  • [10] The influence of landscape context on the production of cultural ecosystem services
    Kim C. Zoeller
    Georgina G. Gurney
    Graeme S. Cumming
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 883 - 894