The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology

被引:70
|
作者
Pike, Kate [1 ]
Wright, Paul [1 ]
Wink, Brian [1 ]
Fletcher, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Southampton Solent Univ, Southampton SO14 OYN, Hants, England
[2] Univ Plymouth, Ctr Marine & Coastal Policy, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
Ecosystem services; Q methodology; Marine protected areas; Cultural value; Chichester Harbour; Pacific Rim National Park; PROTECTED AREAS; SOCIAL VALUE; CONSERVATION; TYPOLOGY; ENGLAND; WALES;
D O I
10.1007/s11852-014-0350-z
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Cultural ecosystem services are generally understood to be the non-material value that can be gained through ecosystems such as a sense of well-being, reflection and spiritual enhancement. These are often linked with a sense of place, culture, heritage and identity. The assessment of cultural ecosystem services, particularly in the marine environment is an inherently complex and difficult task, because they often involve making value judgments which can be hard to quantify. Methods applied to determining the value of these services are often focused on their financial value. Whilst methodologies have been developed to assess the non-material importance of these services, this paper argues that Q methodology provides a highly appropriate way of examining unmeasurable values by being able to convert qualitative, subjective data into quantitative information. The research presents two data sets derived from Q methodology which examined stakeholder views of the cultural values from two marine protected areas; the Pacific Rim National Park, Vancouver Island, Canada and an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in Chichester Harbour, UK. The relevance of using Q methodology as a valuation mechanism in this type of study is examined and justified; whilst highlighting the advantages of tackling a subject of values and intangibility, highly qualitative information, with a structured, semi-automated and primarily quantitative methodology. The findings show that the case-study areas hold three predominant 'factors' of value for its stake holders. These include the protected areas; as a place of care for each other and oneself through the natural world; a place of spirituality; and as a place of freedom and refuge. The paper strongly argues for the use of Q methodology in such a study, which ultimately helps to bring about a depth of information that arguably traditional methods are incapable of in the same capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 675
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology
    Kate Pike
    Paul Wright
    Brian Wink
    Stephen Fletcher
    Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2015, 19 : 667 - 675
  • [2] Assessing Preferences for Cultural Ecosystem Services in the English Countryside Using Q Methodology
    Hubatova, Marie
    McGinlay, James
    Parsons, David J. J.
    Morris, Joe
    Graves, Anil R. R.
    LAND, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [3] Cultural ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea marine environment
    Heini Ahtiainen
    Eero Liski
    Eija Pouta
    Katriina Soini
    Christine Bertram
    Katrin Rehdanz
    Kristine Pakalniete
    Jürgen Meyerhof
    Ambio, 2019, 48 : 1350 - 1361
  • [4] Cultural ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea marine environment
    Ahtiainen, Heini
    Liski, Eero
    Pouta, Eija
    Soini, Katriina
    Bertram, Christine
    Rehdanz, Katrin
    Pakalniete, Kristine
    Meyerhof, Juergen
    AMBIO, 2019, 48 (11) : 1350 - 1361
  • [5] Unravelling Diverse Values of Ecosystem Services: A Socio-Cultural Valuation Using Q Methodology in Messenia, Greece
    Maniatakou, Sofia
    Berg, Hakan
    Maneas, Giorgos
    Daw, Tim M.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 25
  • [6] An assessment of visited landscapes using a Cultural Ecosystem Services framework
    Ram, Yael
    Smith, Melanie Kay
    TOURISM GEOGRAPHIES, 2022, 24 (4-5) : 523 - 548
  • [7] Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Critical Assessment
    James, Simon P.
    ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 18 (03) : 338 - 350
  • [8] Identifying Five Different Perspectives on the Ecosystem Services Concept Using Q Methodology
    Hermelingmeier, Verena
    Nicholas, Kimberly A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 136 : 255 - 265
  • [9] Revealing marine cultural ecosystem services in the Black Sea
    Fletcher, Ruth
    Baulcomb, Corinne
    Hall, Clare
    Hussain, Salman
    MARINE POLICY, 2014, 50 : 151 - 161
  • [10] A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment
    Villa, Ferdinando
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Voigt, Brian
    Johnson, Gary W.
    Portela, Rosimeiry
    Honzak, Miroslav
    Batker, David
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):