A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment

被引:295
|
作者
Villa, Ferdinando [1 ]
Bagstad, Kenneth J. [2 ]
Voigt, Brian [3 ]
Johnson, Gary W. [4 ]
Portela, Rosimeiry [5 ]
Honzak, Miroslav [5 ]
Batker, David [6 ]
机构
[1] Basque Fdn Sci, IKERBASQUE, Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] US Geol Survey, Geosci & Environm Change Sci Ctr, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Ecol Econ, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Comp Sci, Burlington, VT USA
[5] Conservat Int, Arlington, VA USA
[6] Earth Econ, Tacoma, WA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ATTRIBUTION NETWORKS SPANS; ECONOMIC VALUATION; BENEFIT TRANSFER; KNOWLEDGE; DYNAMICS; DESIGN; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; TRANSPARENT; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0091001
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ecosystem Services (ES) are an established conceptual framework for attributing value to the benefits that nature provides to humans. As the promise of robust ES-driven management is put to the test, shortcomings in our ability to accurately measure, map, and value ES have surfaced. On the research side, mainstream methods for ES assessment still fall short of addressing the complex, multi-scale biophysical and socioeconomic dynamics inherent in ES provision, flow, and use. On the practitioner side, application of methods remains onerous due to data and model parameterization requirements. Further, it is increasingly clear that the dominant "one model fits all" paradigm is often ill-suited to address the diversity of real-world management situations that exist across the broad spectrum of coupled human-natural systems. This article introduces an integrated ES modeling methodology, named ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services), which aims to introduce improvements on these fronts. To improve conceptual detail and representation of ES dynamics, it adopts a uniform conceptualization of ES that gives equal emphasis to their production, flow and use by society, while keeping model complexity low enough to enable rapid and inexpensive assessment in many contexts and for multiple services. To improve fit to diverse application contexts, the methodology is assisted by model integration technologies that allow assembly of customized models from a growing model base. By using computer learning and reasoning, model structure may be specialized for each application context without requiring costly expertise. In this article we discuss the founding principles of ARIES - both its innovative aspects for ES science and as an example of a new strategy to support more accurate decision making in diverse application contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A New Collaborative Methodology for Assessment and Management of Ecosystem Services
    Segura, Marina
    Maroto, Concepcion
    Belton, Valerie
    Ginestar, Concepcion
    [J]. FORESTS, 2015, 6 (05): : 1696 - 1720
  • [2] National assessment of ecosystem services in Russia: Methodology and main problems
    Bukvareva, E.
    Zamolodchikov, D.
    Grunewald, K.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 655 : 1181 - 1196
  • [3] The economic assessment of changes in ecosystem services: an application of the CGE methodology
    Bosello, Francesco
    Eboli, Fabio
    Parrado, Ramiro
    Nunes, Paulo A. L. D.
    Ding, Helen
    Rosa, Renato
    [J]. ECONOMIA AGRARIA Y RECURSOS NATURALES, 2011, 11 (01): : 161 - 189
  • [4] The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology
    Pike, Kate
    Wright, Paul
    Wink, Brian
    Fletcher, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 19 (05) : 667 - 675
  • [5] The assessment of cultural ecosystem services in the marine environment using Q methodology
    Kate Pike
    Paul Wright
    Brian Wink
    Stephen Fletcher
    [J]. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2015, 19 : 667 - 675
  • [6] Including Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: Methodology and Application to Urban Farms
    Liu, Xinyu
    Charles, Michael
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. 26TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE), 2019, 80 : 287 - 291
  • [7] MoDAS: Methodology and Tool for Model-Driven Adaptable Services
    Ortiz, Guadalupe
    Peinado, Sonia
    Garcia de Prado, Alfonso
    Boubeta-Puig, Juan
    [J]. SERVICE-ORIENTED COMPUTING - ICSOC 2014 WORKSHOPS, 2015, 8954 : 32 - 43
  • [8] A Methodology to Map Ecosystem Functions to Support Ecosystem Services Assessments
    Petter, Mik
    Mooney, Shannon
    Maynard, Simone M.
    Davidson, Andrew
    Cox, Melanie
    Horosak, Ila
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [9] Approaches to an Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Hydroenergy
    Alibekov A.B.
    Bobylev S.N.
    Khaziakhmetov T.R.
    [J]. Power Technology and Engineering, 2017, 51 (2) : 129 - 134
  • [10] Ecosystem Services in Risk Assessment and Management
    Munns, Wayne R., Jr.
    Poulsen, Veronique
    Gala, William R.
    Marshall, Stuart J.
    Rea, Anne W.
    Sorensen, Mary T.
    von Stackelbergzz, Katherine
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 (01) : 62 - 73