Virtual species distribution models: Using simulated data to evaluate aspects of model performance

被引:44
|
作者
Miller, Jennifer A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Geog & Environm, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
model; prediction; simulated data; species distribution; PRESENCE-ABSENCE MODELS; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; FAVORABILITY FUNCTIONS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; ACCURACY; ECOLOGY; ACCOUNT; PROBABILITY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0309133314521448
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Species distribution models (SDMs) have become a dominant paradigm for quantifying species-environment relationships, and both the models and their outcomes have seen widespread use in conservation studies, particularly in the context of climate change research. With the growing interest in SDMs, extensive comparative studies have been undertaken. However, few generalizations and recommendations have resulted from these empirical studies, largely due to the confounding effects of differences in and interactions among the statistical methods, species traits, data characteristics, and accuracy metrics considered. This progress report addresses virtual species distribution models': the use of spatially explicit simulated data to represent a true' species distribution in order to evaluate aspects of model conceptualization and implementation. Simulating a true' species distribution, or a virtual species distribution, and systematically testing how these aspects affect SDMs, can provide an important baseline and generate new insights into how these issues affect model outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 128
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data
    Santika, Truly
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2011, 20 (01): : 181 - 192
  • [2] Effects of simulated observation errors on the performance of species distribution models
    Fernandes, Rui F.
    Scherrer, Daniel
    Guisan, Antoine
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2019, 25 (03) : 400 - 413
  • [3] Quality of presence data determines species distribution model performance: a novel index to evaluate data quality
    Songlin Fei
    Feng Yu
    Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31 : 31 - 42
  • [4] Quality of presence data determines species distribution model performance: a novel index to evaluate data quality
    Fei, Songlin
    Yu, Feng
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2016, 31 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [5] Using virtual species to study species distributions and model performance
    Meynard, Christine N.
    Kaplan, David M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2013, 40 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [6] Building use-inspired species distribution models: Using multiple data types to examine and improve model performance
    Braun, Camrin D.
    Arostegui, Martin C.
    Farchadi, Nima
    Alexander, Michael
    Afonso, Pedro
    Allyn, Andrew
    Bograd, Steven J.
    Brodie, Stephanie
    Crear, Daniel P.
    Culhane, Emmett F.
    Curtis, Tobey H.
    Hazen, Elliott L.
    Kerney, Alex
    Lezama-Ochoa, Nerea
    Mills, Katherine E.
    Pugh, Dylan
    Queiroz, Nuno
    Scott, James D.
    Skomal, Gregory B.
    Sims, David W.
    Thorrold, Simon R.
    Welch, Heather
    Young-Morse, Riley
    Lewison, Rebecca
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2023, 33 (06)
  • [7] Using genetic data to improve species distribution models
    Bouyer, Jeremy
    Lancelot, Renaud
    INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 63 : 292 - 294
  • [8] Effects of models and spatial resolutions on the species distribution model performance
    Farashi A.
    Alizadeh-Noughani M.
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2018, 4 (1) : 263 - 268
  • [9] Data stochasticity and model parametrisation impact the performance of species distribution models: insights from a simulation study
    Lambert, Charlotte
    Virgili, Auriane
    PEER COMMUNITY JOURNAL, 2023, 3
  • [10] High uncertainty in the effects of data characteristics on the performance of species distribution models
    Tessarolo, Geiziane
    Lobo, Jorge M.
    Rangel, Thiago Fernando
    Hortal, Joaquin
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 121