Virtual species distribution models: Using simulated data to evaluate aspects of model performance

被引:44
|
作者
Miller, Jennifer A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Geog & Environm, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
model; prediction; simulated data; species distribution; PRESENCE-ABSENCE MODELS; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; FAVORABILITY FUNCTIONS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; ACCURACY; ECOLOGY; ACCOUNT; PROBABILITY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0309133314521448
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Species distribution models (SDMs) have become a dominant paradigm for quantifying species-environment relationships, and both the models and their outcomes have seen widespread use in conservation studies, particularly in the context of climate change research. With the growing interest in SDMs, extensive comparative studies have been undertaken. However, few generalizations and recommendations have resulted from these empirical studies, largely due to the confounding effects of differences in and interactions among the statistical methods, species traits, data characteristics, and accuracy metrics considered. This progress report addresses virtual species distribution models': the use of spatially explicit simulated data to represent a true' species distribution in order to evaluate aspects of model conceptualization and implementation. Simulating a true' species distribution, or a virtual species distribution, and systematically testing how these aspects affect SDMs, can provide an important baseline and generate new insights into how these issues affect model outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 128
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incorporating low-resolution historic species location data decreases performance of distribution models
    Reside, April E.
    Watson, Ian
    VanDerWal, Jeremy
    Kutt, Alex S.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (18) : 3444 - 3448
  • [42] The effects of true and pseudo-absence data on the performance of species distribution models at landscape scale
    Liao, Chi-Cheng
    Chen, Yi-Huey
    TAIWANIA, 2022, 67 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [43] A comparison in species distribution model performance of succulents using key species and subsets of environmental predictors
    Buckland, Catherine E.
    Smith, Andrew J. A. C.
    Thomas, David S. G.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [44] Untangling multi-species fisheries data with species distribution models
    McMillan, Matthew N.
    Leahy, Susannah M.
    Hillcoat, Kyle B.
    Wickens, Montana
    Roberts, Eric M.
    Daniell, James J.
    REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 2024, 34 (03) : 1133 - 1148
  • [45] Improving species distribution models: the value of data on abundance
    Howard, Christine
    Stephens, Philip A.
    Pearce-Higgins, James W.
    Gregory, Richard D.
    Willis, Stephen G.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (06): : 506 - 513
  • [46] Predictive performance of plant species distribution models depends on species traits
    Hanspach, Jan
    Kuehn, Ingolf
    Pompe, Sven
    Klotz, Stefan
    PERSPECTIVES IN PLANT ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2010, 12 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [47] Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models
    Mouton, Ans M.
    De Baets, Bernard
    Goethals, Peter L. M.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2010, 221 (16) : 1995 - 2002
  • [48] Imperfect detection impacts the performance of species distribution models
    Lahoz-Monfort, Jose J.
    Guillera-Arroita, Gurutzeta
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 23 (04): : 504 - 515
  • [49] Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models
    Wisz, M. S.
    Hijmans, R. J.
    Li, J.
    Peterson, A. T.
    Graham, C. H.
    Guisan, A.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2008, 14 (05) : 763 - 773
  • [50] The Predictive Performance and Stability of Six Species Distribution Models
    Duan, Ren-Yan
    Kong, Xiao-Quan
    Huang, Min-Yi
    Fan, Wei-Yi
    Wang, Zhi-Gao
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):