CALPHAD Uncertainty Quantification and TDBX

被引:4
|
作者
Lin, Yu [1 ]
Saboo, Abhinav [1 ]
Frey, Ramon [1 ,2 ]
Sorkin, Sam [1 ]
Gong, Jiadong [1 ]
Olson, Gregory B. [1 ]
Li, Meng [3 ]
Niu, Changning [1 ]
机构
[1] QuesTek Innovat LLC, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Rice Univ, Dept Stat, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
CONSISTENT THERMODYNAMIC DATA; BAYESIAN-APPROACH; DERIVATION; MINERALS; DATABASE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s11837-020-04405-z
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
CALPHAD uncertainty quantification (UQ) is the foundation of materials design with quantified confidence. We report a framework and software packages to enable CALPHAD UQ assessment and calculation using commercial CALPHAD software (Thermo-Calc). This Bayesian inference framework is coupled with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to establish uncertainty traces with a given thermodynamic database file (TDB) and corresponding experimental data points. This general framework is demonstrated with the Ni-Cr binary system. The algorithm is firstly validated on synthetic data with known ground truth. Then it is applied to real experimental data to generate posterior traces. We develop a file format named TDBX, which provides a single source of truth by combining the original TDB content and the traces for each assessed Gibbs energy parameter. CALPHAD UQ calculations are performed based on the TDBX file, from which uncertainties for phase boundaries, enthalpy curves, and solidification range are collected as examples of basic design parameters. This TDBX file with corresponding scripts are made open-source. The combination of CALPHAD UQ assessments and calculations connected by TDBX supports uncertainty-assisted modeling, enabling the integrated application of modern design with uncertainty methodologies to computational materials design.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 125
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simultaneous optimization and uncertainty quantification
    Gray, Genetha A.
    Lee, Herbert K. H.
    Guenther, John
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 12 (1-2) : 99 - 110
  • [42] Uncertainty quantification and optimal decisions
    Farmer, C. L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2017, 473 (2200):
  • [43] Quantification of Uncertainty with Adversarial Models
    Schweighofer, Kajetan
    Aichberger, Lukas
    Ielanskyi, Mykyta
    Klambauer, Gunter
    Hochreiter, Sepp
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [44] Uncertainty quantification of subcritical bifurcations
    Nair, Vineeth
    Sarkar, Sunetra
    Sujith, R. I.
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2013, 34 : 177 - 188
  • [45] Uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inversion
    Stuart, Andrew M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MATHEMATICIANS (ICM 2014), VOL IV, 2014, : 1145 - 1162
  • [46] Uncertainty quantification and design under uncertainty of aerospace systems
    Maute, Kurt
    Pettit, Chris L.
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2006, 2 (3-4) : 159 - 159
  • [47] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR MOLECULAR DYNAMICS
    Patrone, Paul N.
    Dienstfrey, Andrew
    REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 31, 2019, 31 : 115 - 169
  • [48] Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Optimization
    Tuo, Rui
    Wang, Wenjia
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151
  • [49] Uncertainty quantification in littoral erosion
    Mohammadi, Bijan
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2017, 143 : 120 - 133
  • [50] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN SUNSPOT COUNTS
    Mathieu, Sophie
    von Sachs, Rainer
    Delouille, Veronique
    Lefevre, Laure
    2018 IEEE DATA SCIENCE WORKSHOP (DSW), 2018, : 36 - 40