CALPHAD Uncertainty Quantification and TDBX

被引:4
|
作者
Lin, Yu [1 ]
Saboo, Abhinav [1 ]
Frey, Ramon [1 ,2 ]
Sorkin, Sam [1 ]
Gong, Jiadong [1 ]
Olson, Gregory B. [1 ]
Li, Meng [3 ]
Niu, Changning [1 ]
机构
[1] QuesTek Innovat LLC, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Rice Univ, Dept Stat, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
CONSISTENT THERMODYNAMIC DATA; BAYESIAN-APPROACH; DERIVATION; MINERALS; DATABASE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s11837-020-04405-z
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
CALPHAD uncertainty quantification (UQ) is the foundation of materials design with quantified confidence. We report a framework and software packages to enable CALPHAD UQ assessment and calculation using commercial CALPHAD software (Thermo-Calc). This Bayesian inference framework is coupled with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to establish uncertainty traces with a given thermodynamic database file (TDB) and corresponding experimental data points. This general framework is demonstrated with the Ni-Cr binary system. The algorithm is firstly validated on synthetic data with known ground truth. Then it is applied to real experimental data to generate posterior traces. We develop a file format named TDBX, which provides a single source of truth by combining the original TDB content and the traces for each assessed Gibbs energy parameter. CALPHAD UQ calculations are performed based on the TDBX file, from which uncertainties for phase boundaries, enthalpy curves, and solidification range are collected as examples of basic design parameters. This TDBX file with corresponding scripts are made open-source. The combination of CALPHAD UQ assessments and calculations connected by TDBX supports uncertainty-assisted modeling, enabling the integrated application of modern design with uncertainty methodologies to computational materials design.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 125
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantification of uncertainty in geochemical reactions
    Srinivasan, Gowri
    Tartakovsky, Daniel M.
    Robinson, Bruce A.
    Aceves, Alejandro B.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (12)
  • [32] Multifidelity approaches for uncertainty quantification
    Biehler J.
    Mäck M.
    Nitzler J.
    Hanss M.
    Koutsourelakis P.-S.
    Wall W.A.
    GAMM Mitteilungen, 2019, 42 (02)
  • [33] On uncertainty quantification in vibroacoustic problems
    Sepahvand, K.
    Marburg, S.
    EURODYN 2014: IX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, : 3259 - 3263
  • [34] Uncertainty Quantification for Text Classification
    Zhang, Dell
    Sensoy, Murat
    Makrehchi, Masoud
    Taneva-Popova, Bilyana
    ADVANCES IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, ECIR 2023, PT III, 2023, 13982 : 362 - 369
  • [35] Uncertainty quantification in system identification
    Au, S. K.
    Zhang, F. L.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ASSESSMENT, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 1072 - 1076
  • [36] Uncertainty Quantification in Chemical Modeling
    Mirzayeva, A.
    Slavinskaya, N. A.
    Abbasi, M.
    Starcke, J. H.
    Li, W.
    Frenklach, M.
    EURASIAN CHEMICO-TECHNOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 20 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [37] Uncertainty quantification with hybrid α-cut
    Mousavi, Seyed Sadredin
    Behbahani, Saeed
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (16) : 7321 - 7331
  • [38] Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensembles
    Rahaman, Rahul
    Thiery, Alexandre H.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 34 (NEURIPS 2021), 2021,
  • [39] Distributional Sensitivity for Uncertainty Quantification
    Narayan, Akil
    Xiu, Dongbin
    COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2011, 10 (01) : 140 - 160
  • [40] Spectral analysis for uncertainty quantification
    Lee, Barry
    NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 28 (04)