Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in severe male factor infertility

被引:2
|
作者
Asoglu, Mehmet Resit [1 ]
Celik, Cem [2 ,3 ]
Serefoglu, Ege Can [1 ,4 ]
Findikli, Necati [1 ]
Bahceci, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Bahceci Fulya Assisted Reprod Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bahceci Umut Assisted Reprod Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Uskudar Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Biruni Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Live birth; Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies; Severe male factor infertility; RECOMBINATION; CHROMOSOMES; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: Does the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) improve outcomes in couples with severe male factor infertility (SMFI)? Design: This retrospective cohort study included SMFI cases that underwent blastocyst transfer with/without PGT-A. Inclusion criteria were SMFI (azoospermia and sperm count <1 million/ml), women aged 25-39 years, single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer, and no intracavitary pathologies. Patients were divided into PGT-A and nonPGT-A groups. The primary outcome was live birth rate (live birth of an infant after 24 weeks of gestation); secondary outcomes were implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. Results: The study included 266 SMFI cases (90 and 176 in the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups, respectively). Men and women in the PGT-A group were significantly older than those in the non-PGT-A group. The groups did not differ in terms of male factor categories, sperm collection methods or additional female factors. Live birth rates in the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups were 55.6% and 51.1%, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.98, P = 0.495). The implantation rates were 65.6% and 64.2%, respectively (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.62-1.80, P = 0.827). The clinical pregnancy rates were 62.2% and 58.0%, respectively (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.71-2.01, P = 0.502). The use of PGT-A was not an independent factor for live birth (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.66-2.70, P = 0.421). Advanced age in women was the only independent factor associated with live birth (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96, P = 0.041). Conclusions: The use of PGT-A does not seem to be an independent factor associated with live birth per transfer in couples with SMFI.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 603
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genetic testing for monogenic forms of male infertility contributes to the clinical diagnosis of men with idiopathic severe male infertility
    Podgrajsek, Rebeka
    Hodzic, Alenka
    Maver, Ales
    Stimpfel, Martin
    Andjelic, Aleksander
    Miljanovic, Olivera
    Ristanovic, Momcilo
    Novakovic, Ivana
    Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana
    Noveski, Predrag
    Ostojic, Sasa
    Grskovic, Antun
    Buretic-Tomljanovic, Alena
    Peterlin, Borut
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 356 - 357
  • [42] A genetic survey of 1935 Turkish men with severe male factor infertility
    Kumtepe, Yakup
    Beyazyurek, Cagri
    Cinar, Cigdem
    Ozbey, Isa
    Ozkan, Semih
    Cetinkaya, Kadir
    Karlikaya, Guevenc
    Karagozoglu, Hale
    Kahraman, Semra
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 18 (04) : 465 - 474
  • [43] MALE FACTOR INFERTILITY AND ANEUPLOIDY: DO COUPLES WITH MALE FACTOR INFERTILITY HAVE A LOWER RATE OF EUPLOID EMBRYOS?.
    Ganza, A. L.
    Whitehouse, M. C.
    Lee, J. A.
    McGovern, P. G.
    Bar-Chama, N.
    Copperman, A. B.
    Stein, D. E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (03) : E226 - E227
  • [44] The time is now to change the narrative on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy
    Cooper, Amber R.
    Viotti, Manuel
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 122 (01) : 74 - 75
  • [45] Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: Has the Controversy Settled? A Review
    Roisin Mortimer
    Elizabeth Ginsburg
    [J]. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2022, 11 : 48 - 54
  • [46] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)—finally revealed
    Raoul Orvieto
    Norbert Gleicher
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2020, 37 : 669 - 672
  • [47] Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: Has the Controversy Settled? A Review
    Mortimer, Roisin
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth
    [J]. CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 11 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [48] Live Birth with or without Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy REPLY
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    Zhang, Heping
    Legro, Richard S.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 386 (07): : 703 - 704
  • [49] Do the risks of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy outbalance the benefits?
    Diedrich, Klaus
    Grewe, Sebastian
    Devroey, Paul
    [J]. GYNAKOLOGE, 2019, 52 (09): : 667 - 672
  • [50] Preimplantation genetic testing for cystic fibrosis and aneuploidy in clinical practice
    Diblik, J.
    Soldatova, I.
    Sekowska, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 29 - 30