Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in severe male factor infertility

被引:2
|
作者
Asoglu, Mehmet Resit [1 ]
Celik, Cem [2 ,3 ]
Serefoglu, Ege Can [1 ,4 ]
Findikli, Necati [1 ]
Bahceci, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Bahceci Fulya Assisted Reprod Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bahceci Umut Assisted Reprod Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Uskudar Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Biruni Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Live birth; Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies; Severe male factor infertility; RECOMBINATION; CHROMOSOMES; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Research question: Does the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) improve outcomes in couples with severe male factor infertility (SMFI)? Design: This retrospective cohort study included SMFI cases that underwent blastocyst transfer with/without PGT-A. Inclusion criteria were SMFI (azoospermia and sperm count <1 million/ml), women aged 25-39 years, single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer, and no intracavitary pathologies. Patients were divided into PGT-A and nonPGT-A groups. The primary outcome was live birth rate (live birth of an infant after 24 weeks of gestation); secondary outcomes were implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. Results: The study included 266 SMFI cases (90 and 176 in the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups, respectively). Men and women in the PGT-A group were significantly older than those in the non-PGT-A group. The groups did not differ in terms of male factor categories, sperm collection methods or additional female factors. Live birth rates in the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups were 55.6% and 51.1%, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.98, P = 0.495). The implantation rates were 65.6% and 64.2%, respectively (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.62-1.80, P = 0.827). The clinical pregnancy rates were 62.2% and 58.0%, respectively (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.71-2.01, P = 0.502). The use of PGT-A was not an independent factor for live birth (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.66-2.70, P = 0.421). Advanced age in women was the only independent factor associated with live birth (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96, P = 0.041). Conclusions: The use of PGT-A does not seem to be an independent factor associated with live birth per transfer in couples with SMFI.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 603
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Live Birth with or without Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
    Yan, Junhao
    Qin, Yingying
    Zhao, Han
    Sun, Yun
    Gong, Fei
    Li, Rong
    Sun, Xiaoxi
    Ling, Xiufeng
    Li, Hong
    Hao, Cuifang
    Tan, Jichun
    Yang, Jing
    Zhu, Yimin
    Liu, Fenghua
    Chen, Dawei
    Wei, Daimin
    Lu, Juanjuan
    Ni, Tianxiang
    Zhou, Wei
    Wu, Keliang
    Gao, Yuan
    Shi, Yuhua
    Lu, Yao
    Zhang, Ting
    Wu, Wei
    Ma, Xiang
    Ma, Hailan
    Fu, Jing
    Zhang, Junqiang
    Meng, Qingxia
    Zhang, Heping
    Legro, Richard S.
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (22): : 2047 - 2058
  • [22] Advances in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disease and Aneuploidy
    Treff, Nathan R.
    Zimmerman, Rebekah S.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, VOL 18, 2017, 18 : 189 - 200
  • [23] The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on prenatal screening
    Gulersen, Moti
    Peyser, Alexandra
    Kim, Jiyoung
    Ferraro, Amanda
    Goldman, Randi
    Mullin, Christine
    Li, Xueying
    Krantz, David
    Bornstein, Eran
    Rochelson, Burton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (03) : 300 - 304
  • [24] What are the cost considerations for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy?
    Robinson, Randal D.
    Rippentrop, Sheena
    McLaughlin, Jessica E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 111 (06) : 1115 - 1116
  • [25] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: challenges in clinical practice
    Hui Yang
    Andrew Thomas DeWan
    Mayur M. Desai
    Sten H. Vermund
    [J]. Human Genomics, 16
  • [26] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy : The management of mosaic embryos
    Yu, Eun Jeong
    Kim, Min Jee
    Park, Eun A.
    Kang, Inn Soo
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE-CERM, 2022, 49 (03): : 159 - 167
  • [27] Conventional IVF is feasible in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy
    Shuoping Zhang
    Pingyuan Xie
    Fang Lan
    Yaxin Yao
    Shujuan Ma
    Liang Hu
    Yueqiu Tan
    Bo Jiang
    Anqi Wan
    Dunmei Zhao
    Fei Gong
    Sijia Lu
    Ge Lin
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 2333 - 2342
  • [28] The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on prenatal screening
    Gulersen, Moti
    Peyser, Alexandra
    Kim, Jiyoung
    Ferraro, Amanda
    Goldman, Randi
    Mullin, Christine
    Li, Xueying
    Krantz, David
    Bornstein, Eran
    Rochelson, Burton
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S570 - S571
  • [29] Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: predictive embryonic factors
    Florensa, Mireia
    Cladellas, Anna
    Ballesteros, Agustin
    Esbert, Marga
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2024, 41 (05) : 1329 - 1339
  • [30] Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy - a Castle Built on Sand
    Gleicher, Norbert
    Patrizio, Pasquale
    Brivanlou, Ali
    [J]. TRENDS IN MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 27 (08) : 731 - 742