Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

被引:175
|
作者
Boggi, U. [1 ]
Signori, S. [1 ]
De Lio, N. [1 ]
Perrone, V. G. [1 ]
Vistoli, F. [1 ]
Belluomini, M. [1 ]
Cappelli, C. [2 ]
Amorese, G. [3 ]
Mosca, F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Pisa Univ Hosp, Div Gen & Transplant Surg, Pisa, Italy
[2] Pisa Univ Hosp, Div Radiol, Pisa, Italy
[3] Pisa Univ Hosp, Div Gen & Vasc Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Pisa, Italy
[4] Pisa Univ Hosp, Div Gen Surg 1, Pisa, Italy
关键词
INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; PYLORUS-PRESERVING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATIC SURGERY ISGPS; CONSECUTIVE PANCREATICODUODENECTOMIES; ASSISTED PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; SINGLE INSTITUTION; HOSPITAL VOLUME; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.9135
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, but requires adaptations to established surgical techniques. The improved dexterity offered by robotic assistance provides the opportunity to see whether laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely when faithfully reproducing the open operation. Methods: Patients were selected for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy when generally suitable for laparoscopy. Obese patients were excluded, and those with pancreatic cancer were highly selected. A prospectively designed database was used for data collection and analysis. Results: Of 238 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, 34 (14.3 per cent) were operated on robotically. No procedure was converted to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery, despite three patients requiring segmental resection of the superior mesenteric/portal vein and reconstruction. The mean duration of operation was 597 (range 420-960) min. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved and analysed from patients with neoplasia was 32 (range 15-76). Four patients required blood transfusions and five developed postoperative complications exceeding Clavien-Dindo grade II. There were four grade B pancreatic fistulas. One patient died on postoperative day 40. Excess mean operative cost compared with open resection was (sic) 6193. Conclusion: Selected patients can safely undergo robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. The main downsides are high costs and prolonged operating times compared with open resection.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 925
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature
    Kornaropoulos, Michail
    Moris, Demetrios
    Beal, Eliza W.
    Makris, Marinos C.
    Mitrousias, Apostolos
    Petrou, Athanasios
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Michalinos, Adamantios
    Vailas, Michail
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    Papalampros, Alexandros
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (11): : 4382 - 4392
  • [32] Early experience of laparoscopic and robotic hybrid pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Kim, Jae Ri
    Han, Youngmin
    Kwon, Wooil
    Kim, Sun-Whe
    Jang, Jin-Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03):
  • [33] Chyle leakage after robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Shyr, Bor-Uei
    Shyr, Bor-Shiuan
    Chen, Shih-Chin
    Shyr, Yi-Ming
    Wang, Shin-E
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (05) : 273 - 279
  • [34] Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Qin, Kai
    Wu, Zhichong
    Jin, Jiabin
    Shen, Baiyong
    Peng, Chenghong
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 2287 - 2293
  • [35] Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Future: Here and Now Discussion
    Hughes, Steven J.
    Merchant, Nipun B.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    Kooby, David A.
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Rosemurgy, Alexander S., II
    Lin, Edward
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 228 (04) : 624 - 626
  • [36] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis
    Nassour, Ibrahim
    Wang, Sam C.
    Porembka, Matthew R.
    Yopp, Adam C.
    Choti, Michael A.
    Augustine, Mathew M.
    Polanco, Patricio M.
    Mansour, John C.
    Minter, Rebecca M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (11) : 1784 - 1792
  • [37] Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre - Early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Gall, Tamara MH.
    Pencavel, Tim D.
    Cunningham, David
    Nicol, David
    Jiao, Long R.
    HPB, 2020, 22 (11) : 1637 - 1644
  • [38] Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Propensity-Matched Analysis to Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    A. Floortje van Oosten
    Ding Ding
    Joseph R. Habib
    Ahmer Irfan
    Ryan K. Schmocker
    Elisabetta Sereni
    Benedict Kinny-Köster
    Michael Wright
    Vincent P. Groot
    I. Quintus Molenaar
    John L. Cameron
    Martin Makary
    Richard A. Burkhart
    William R. Burns
    Christopher L. Wolfgang
    Jin He
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 1795 - 1804
  • [39] Defining the learning curve for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for a single surgeon following experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Delaura, Isabel
    Sharib, Jeremy
    Creasy, John M.
    Berchuck, Samuel I.
    Blazer III, Dan G.
    Lidsky, Michael E.
    Shah, Kevin N.
    Zani Jr, Sabino
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [40] Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Propensity-Matched Analysis to Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    van Oosten, A. Floortje
    Ding, Ding
    Habib, Joseph R.
    Irfan, Ahmer
    Schmocker, Ryan K.
    Sereni, Elisabetta
    Kinny-Koster, Benedict
    Wright, Michael
    Groot, Vincent P.
    Molenaar, I. Quintus
    Cameron, John L.
    Makary, Martin
    Burkhart, Richard A.
    Burns, William R.
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    He, Jin
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (07) : 1795 - 1804