Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods

被引:35
|
作者
Chow, Jacky C. K. [1 ]
Lichti, Derek D. [1 ]
Glennie, Craig [2 ]
Hartzell, Preston [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Geomat Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Houston, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
基金
加拿大创新基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
LiDAR; terrestrial laser scanners; calibration; accuracy; error analysis; quality assurance; VELODYNE HDL-64E S2; LASER SCANNER; STABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/s130607224
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Terrestrial laser scanners are sophisticated instruments that operate much like high-speed total stations. It has previously been shown that unmodelled systematic errors can exist in modern terrestrial laser scanners that deteriorate their geometric measurement precision and accuracy. Typically, signalised targets are used in point-based self-calibrations to identify and model the systematic errors. Although this method has proven its effectiveness, a large quantity of signalised targets is required and is therefore labour-intensive and limits its practicality. In recent years, feature-based self-calibration of aerial, mobile terrestrial, and static terrestrial laser scanning systems has been demonstrated. In this paper, the commonalities and differences between point-based and plane-based self-calibration ( in terms of model identification and parameter correlation) are explored. The results of this research indicate that much of the knowledge from point-based self-calibration can be directly transferred to plane-based calibration and that the two calibration approaches are nearly equivalent. New network configurations, such as the inclusion of tilted scans, were also studied and prove to be an effective means for strengthening the self-calibration solution, and improved recoverability of the horizontal collimation axis error for hybrid scanners, which has always posed a challenge in the past.
引用
收藏
页码:7224 / 7249
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DyLESC: A Dynamic LiDAR Extrinsic Self-Calibration Method for Intelligent Driving Vehicles
    Jie, Haoxiang
    Zhou, Yibo
    Ning, Zuotao
    Zhao, Qixi
    Liu, Lifeng
    Hu, Jun
    2022 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, ICITE, 2022, : 185 - 190
  • [32] Improving self-calibration
    Ensslin, Torsten A.
    Junklewitz, Henrik
    Winderling, Lars
    Greiner, Maksim
    Selig, Marco
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2014, 90 (04):
  • [33] ANALYTICAL SELF-CALIBRATION
    KENEFICK, JF
    HARP, BF
    GYER, MS
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING, 1972, 38 (11): : 1117 - &
  • [34] Ultrasound self-calibration
    Boctor, Emad M.
    Iordachita, Lulian
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    Hager, Gregory D.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2006: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND DISPLAY, 2006, 6141
  • [35] SELF-CALIBRATION OF THE TRIMBLE (MENSI) GS200 TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNER
    Chow, J. C. K.
    Lichti, D. D.
    Teskey, W. F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ISPRS COMMISSION V MID-TERM SYMPOSIUM CLOSE RANGE IMAGE MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2010, 38 : 161 - 166
  • [36] End-to-End Lidar-Camera Self-Calibration for Autonomous Vehicles
    Rachman, Arya
    Seiler, Jurgen
    Kaup, Andre
    2023 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM, IV, 2023,
  • [37] Online Targetless End-to-End Camera-LIDAR Self-calibration
    Nagy, Balazs
    Kovacs, Levente
    Benedek, Csaba
    PROCEEDINGS OF MVA 2019 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION APPLICATIONS (MVA), 2019,
  • [38] A rigorous cylinder-based self-calibration approach for terrestrial laser scanners
    Chan, Ting On
    Lichti, Derek D.
    Belton, David
    ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 99 : 84 - 99
  • [39] Comparison of 3-D Self-Calibration Methods for High-Precision Measurement Instruments
    Qiao, Xiaoyue
    Ding, Guoqing
    Chen, Xin
    Cai, Ping
    Shao, Li
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2022, 71
  • [40] Research on High Accuracy Current Comparator and Self-Calibration Methods
    He Xiaobing
    Wang Wei
    Zhang Xin
    Dai Dongxue
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2013, 62 (06) : 1669 - 1674