Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods

被引:35
|
作者
Chow, Jacky C. K. [1 ]
Lichti, Derek D. [1 ]
Glennie, Craig [2 ]
Hartzell, Preston [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Geomat Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Houston, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
基金
加拿大创新基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
LiDAR; terrestrial laser scanners; calibration; accuracy; error analysis; quality assurance; VELODYNE HDL-64E S2; LASER SCANNER; STABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/s130607224
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Terrestrial laser scanners are sophisticated instruments that operate much like high-speed total stations. It has previously been shown that unmodelled systematic errors can exist in modern terrestrial laser scanners that deteriorate their geometric measurement precision and accuracy. Typically, signalised targets are used in point-based self-calibrations to identify and model the systematic errors. Although this method has proven its effectiveness, a large quantity of signalised targets is required and is therefore labour-intensive and limits its practicality. In recent years, feature-based self-calibration of aerial, mobile terrestrial, and static terrestrial laser scanning systems has been demonstrated. In this paper, the commonalities and differences between point-based and plane-based self-calibration ( in terms of model identification and parameter correlation) are explored. The results of this research indicate that much of the knowledge from point-based self-calibration can be directly transferred to plane-based calibration and that the two calibration approaches are nearly equivalent. New network configurations, such as the inclusion of tilted scans, were also studied and prove to be an effective means for strengthening the self-calibration solution, and improved recoverability of the horizontal collimation axis error for hybrid scanners, which has always posed a challenge in the past.
引用
收藏
页码:7224 / 7249
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LCCNet: LiDAR and Camera Self-Calibration using Cost Volume Network
    Lv, Xudong
    Wang, Boya
    Dou, Ziwen
    Ye, Dong
    Wang, Shuo
    2021 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOPS, CVPRW 2021, 2021, : 2888 - 2895
  • [22] Point cloud refinement with self-calibration of a mobile multibeam lidar sensor
    Nouira, Houssem
    Deschaud, Jean-Emmanuel
    Goulette, Francois
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC RECORD, 2017, 32 (159): : 291 - 316
  • [23] CYLINDER-BASED SELF-CALIBRATION OF A PANORAMIC TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNER
    Chan, Ting On
    Lichti, Derek D.
    XXII ISPRS CONGRESS, TECHNICAL COMMISSION V, 2012, 39-B5 : 169 - 174
  • [24] Comparison of self-calibration methods for measurement channels in respect of a method of conversion functions interpolation
    Gawedzki, W.
    Measurement 2007: 6th International Conference on Measurement, Proceedings, 2007, : 17 - 20
  • [25] Comparison of Self-Calibration Methods for Measurement Channels in Respect of a Method of Conversion Functions Interpolation
    Gawedzki, W.
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW, 2008, 8 (02): : 25 - 28
  • [26] Methods and geometry for plane-based self-calibration
    Gurdjos, P
    Sturm, P
    2003 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 491 - 496
  • [27] UPGRADE METHODS FOR STRATIFIED SENSOR NETWORK SELF-CALIBRATION
    Larsson, M.
    Flood, G.
    Oskarsson, M.
    Astrom, K.
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2020, : 4851 - 4855
  • [28] UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY TO MONITOR DYKES - CALIBRATION AND COMPARISON TO TERRESTRIAL LIDAR
    Tournadre, V.
    Pierrot-Deseilligny, M.
    Faure, P. H.
    EUROPEAN CALIBRATION AND ORIENTATION WORKSHOP (EUROCOW 2014), 2014, : 143 - 148
  • [29] Error estimation for lattice methods of stage self-calibration
    Raugh, MR
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XI, 1997, 3050 : 614 - 625
  • [30] Catadioptric self-calibration
    Kang, SB
    IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, PROCEEDINGS, VOL I, 2000, : 201 - 207