Comparative measurements of 60Co 'hot particle' depth-dose distributions and Monte Carlo calculations

被引:15
|
作者
Villarreal-Barajas, JE [1 ]
Darley, PJ [1 ]
Charles, MW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Phys & Astron, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032908
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The present study attempts to compare several possible measurement techniques and MCNP Monte Carlo calculations of beta/gamma doses from test 'bench-mark' Co-60 hot particle sources. Depth-dose distributions have been obtained by ionmetric measurements using ionisation extrapolation chamber (ECH) and densitometric measurements using radiation induced colour changes in radiochromic dye films (RDF). The ECH provides absorbed dose information averaged over specific areas dictated by the measuring electrode diameter (1 mm, 3 mm, 1 cm and 3 cm). The RDF displays full two-dimensional dose distributions in a single measurement with a high spatial resolution down to 25 mu m. In general there was good agreement between the two measurement techniques for the doses measured close to the surface after correction due to the non-linear response of the ionisation response relative to electrode separation (mainly due to the spatially non-uniform radiation field). However the agreement is markedly worse at greater depths where the dose is dominated by the gamma ray component. The measurements and MCNP4B calculations agree within a few per cent for the surface dose rate and to within similar to 30% at 30 mg.cm(-2). The reasons for these differences are discussed.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:507 / 512
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] SEMIEMPIRICAL DEPTH-DOSE DISTRIBUTION FORMULA FOR CO-60 GAMMA-RAYS
    RAVISHANKAR, R
    SENGUPTA, M
    BANDYOPADHYAY, T
    MUTHUKRISHNAN, G
    GHOSE, AM
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 1994, 44 (1-2): : 19 - 24
  • [43] Comparison of treatment planning dose calculations with measurements and Monte Carlo calculations in a RANDO phantom
    Wyatt, M
    Corredor, C
    Tamimi, M
    Miller, LF
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 116 (1-4) : 461 - 465
  • [44] Monte Carlo simulation of depth-dose distribution in several organic models for boron neutron capture therapy
    Matsumoto, T.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2007, 580 (01): : 552 - 557
  • [45] Monte Carlo calculations of radiotherapy dose distributions within and around orthopaedic implants
    Katsifis, Georgio Andrew
    McKenzie, David R.
    Suchowerska, Natalka
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 22 : 123 - 130
  • [46] MONTE CARLO AND ANALYTICAL CALCULATIONS OF DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS IN CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA CYSTS TREATED WITH RADIOCOLLOIDS
    Sadeghi, M.
    Karimi, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S221 - S221
  • [47] Measurements and Monte Carlo calculations of photon energy distributions in MAYAK PA workplaces
    Smetanin, M.
    Vasilenko, E.
    Semenov, M.
    Xanthos, S.
    Takoudis, G.
    Clouvas, A.
    Silva, J.
    Potiriadis, C.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 131 (04) : 455 - 468
  • [48] On the use of the absorbed depth-dose measurements in the beam calibration of a surface electronic high-dose-rate brachytherapy unit, a Monte Carlo-based study
    Valdes-Cortez, Christian
    Niatsetski, Yury
    Ballester, Facundo
    Vijande, Javier
    Candela-Juan, Cristian
    Perez-Calatayud, Jose
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (02) : 693 - 702
  • [49] Depth-dose measurement corrections for the surface electronic brachytherapy beams of an Esteya(R) unit: a Monte Carlo study
    Valdes-Cortez, Christian
    Ballester, Facundo
    Vijande, Javier
    Gimenez, Vicent
    Gimenez-Alventosa, Vicent
    Perez-Calatayud, Jose
    Niatsetski, Yury
    Andreo, Pedro
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (24):
  • [50] An algorithm for depth-dose curves of electrons fitted to Monte Carlo data (vol 53, pg 205, 1998)
    Tabata, Tatsuo
    Andreo, Pedro
    Shinoda, Kunihiko
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2016, 119 : 287 - 287