Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide cancer therapy

被引:35
|
作者
Bregni, M
Siena, S
DiNicola, M
Dodero, A
Peccatori, F
Ravagnani, F
Danesini, G
Laffranchi, A
Bonadonna, G
Gianni, AM
机构
[1] IST NAZL TUMORI,DEPT CANC MED,DIV MED ONCOL,CRISTINA GANDINI TRANSPLANTAT UNIT,I-20133 MILAN,ITALY
[2] IST NAZL TUMORI,DIV RADIOL A,I-20133 MILAN,ITALY
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.628
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared hematologic and clinical effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX, 7g/m(2)), given as the first phase of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy program that includes a myeloablative therapy with mobilized progenitor cell autografting. Patients and Methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, or poor-prognosis breast cancer received GM-CSF (n=27) or G-CSF (n=22) after HD-CTX in two consecutive, nonrandomized studies. Cytokines were administered in continuous intravenous (IV) infusion for 14 to 15 days at a median dose of 5.5 and 10 mu g/kg/d, respectively, starting 24 hours after HD-CTX. Results: Neutrophil recovery was faster with G-CSF administration (11.5 v 13.2 days; P=.01), whereas platelet counts recovered more rapidly with GM-CSF(13.7 v 16.6 days; P=.01). Prophylactic platelet transfusions were administered more frequently to patients treated with G-CSF than with GM-CSF (66% v 22% of the patients; P=.02). No clinically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning days of absolute neutropenia or neutropenic fever, Both cytokines reduced the rime to eligibility for subsequent chemotherapy administration compared with historical controls not given cytokine (14 to 16 v 20 days). Both cytokines increased circulation of hematopoietic progenitors. Most side effects were World Health Organization (WHO) median grade 1 to 2, were more frequent during GM-CSF than during G-CSF treatment, and were reversible by simple supportive measures and/or by dose reduction or suspension of the cytokine. Permanent suspension of cytokine administration was never required in either group. Conclusion: GM-CSF or G-CSF administration after HD-CTX reduces hematologic toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and induces circulation of large amounts of hematopoietic progenitors suitable for autografting in cancer patients. (C) 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 635
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR OR GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR INFUSION MAKES HIGH-DOSE ETOPOSIDE A SAFE OUTPATIENT REGIMEN THAT IS EFFECTIVE IN LYMPHOMA AND MYELOMA PATIENTS
    GIANNI, AM
    BREGNI, M
    SIENA, S
    MAGNI, M
    DINICOLA, M
    LOMBARDI, F
    TARELLA, C
    PILERI, A
    BONADONNA, G
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (12) : 1955 - 1962
  • [42] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: Comparisons and potential for use in the treatment of infections in nonneutropenic patients
    Root, RK
    Dale, DC
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 179 : S342 - S352
  • [43] Role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the development of an acute neutrophil inflammatory response in mice
    Metcalf, D
    Robb, L
    Dunn, AR
    Mifsud, S
    DiRago, L
    BLOOD, 1996, 88 (10) : 3755 - 3764
  • [44] The requirement for granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in leukocyte-mediated immune glomerular injury
    Kitching, AR
    Huang, XR
    Turner, AL
    Tipping, PG
    Dunn, AR
    Holdsworth, SR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (02): : 350 - 358
  • [45] STIMULATION AND PRIMING OF HUMAN NEUTROPHILS BY GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR AND GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR - QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DIFFERENCES
    YUO, A
    KITAGAWA, S
    OHSAKA, A
    SAITO, M
    TAKAKU, F
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1990, 171 (01) : 491 - 497
  • [46] Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF
    Ballestrero, A
    Ferrando, F
    Garuti, A
    Basta, P
    Gonella, R
    Stura, P
    Mela, GS
    Sessarego, M
    Gobbi, M
    Patrone, F
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (04) : 1296 - 1303
  • [47] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces neutrophils to secrete macrophage colony-stimulating factor
    Santiago, E
    Mora, L
    Bautista, M
    Montesinos, JJ
    Martinez, I
    Ramos, G
    Zambrano, IR
    Manrique, B
    Weiss-Steider, B
    CYTOKINE, 2001, 15 (06) : 299 - 304
  • [48] Comparison between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells
    Gazitt, Y
    CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY, 2002, 9 (03) : 190 - 198
  • [49] Clozapine-Associated Agranulocytosis Treatment With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor: A Systematic Review
    Lally, John
    Malik, Steffi
    Whiskey, Eromona
    Taylor, David M.
    Gaughran, Fiona P.
    Krivoy, Amir
    Flanagan, Robert J.
    Mijovic, Aleksandar
    MacCabe, James H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 37 (04) : 441 - 446
  • [50] GRANULOCYTE AND GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS
    STEWARD, WP
    LANCET, 1993, 342 (8864): : 153 - 157