Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide cancer therapy

被引:35
|
作者
Bregni, M
Siena, S
DiNicola, M
Dodero, A
Peccatori, F
Ravagnani, F
Danesini, G
Laffranchi, A
Bonadonna, G
Gianni, AM
机构
[1] IST NAZL TUMORI,DEPT CANC MED,DIV MED ONCOL,CRISTINA GANDINI TRANSPLANTAT UNIT,I-20133 MILAN,ITALY
[2] IST NAZL TUMORI,DIV RADIOL A,I-20133 MILAN,ITALY
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.628
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared hematologic and clinical effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX, 7g/m(2)), given as the first phase of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy program that includes a myeloablative therapy with mobilized progenitor cell autografting. Patients and Methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, or poor-prognosis breast cancer received GM-CSF (n=27) or G-CSF (n=22) after HD-CTX in two consecutive, nonrandomized studies. Cytokines were administered in continuous intravenous (IV) infusion for 14 to 15 days at a median dose of 5.5 and 10 mu g/kg/d, respectively, starting 24 hours after HD-CTX. Results: Neutrophil recovery was faster with G-CSF administration (11.5 v 13.2 days; P=.01), whereas platelet counts recovered more rapidly with GM-CSF(13.7 v 16.6 days; P=.01). Prophylactic platelet transfusions were administered more frequently to patients treated with G-CSF than with GM-CSF (66% v 22% of the patients; P=.02). No clinically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning days of absolute neutropenia or neutropenic fever, Both cytokines reduced the rime to eligibility for subsequent chemotherapy administration compared with historical controls not given cytokine (14 to 16 v 20 days). Both cytokines increased circulation of hematopoietic progenitors. Most side effects were World Health Organization (WHO) median grade 1 to 2, were more frequent during GM-CSF than during G-CSF treatment, and were reversible by simple supportive measures and/or by dose reduction or suspension of the cytokine. Permanent suspension of cytokine administration was never required in either group. Conclusion: GM-CSF or G-CSF administration after HD-CTX reduces hematologic toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and induces circulation of large amounts of hematopoietic progenitors suitable for autografting in cancer patients. (C) 1996 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 635
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thrombin Stimulates Synthesis of Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor by Human Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells in Culture
    Shimaya, Yuko
    Shimada, Michiko
    Shutto, Yoshiko
    Fujita, Takeshi
    Murakami, Reiichi
    Nakamura, Norio
    Yamabe, Hideaki
    Okumura, Ken
    NEPHRON EXTRA, 2012, 2 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [22] Production of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor by carcinomas in a dog and a cat with paraneoplastic leukocytosis
    Sharkey, LC
    Rosol, IJ
    Grone, A
    Ward, H
    Steinmeyer, C
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 10 (06) : 405 - 408
  • [23] LEVELS OF HUMAN SERUM GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR AND GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR UNDER PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
    OMORI, F
    OKAMURA, S
    SHIMODA, K
    OTSUKA, T
    HARADA, M
    NIHO, Y
    BIOTHERAPY, 1992, 4 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [24] Effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on glial scar formation after spinal cord injury in rats
    Chung, Joonho
    Kim, Moon Hang
    Yoon, Yong Je
    Kim, Kil Hwan
    Park, So Ra
    Choi, Byung Hyune
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (06) : 966 - 973
  • [25] THE ROLE OF GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR AND GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN CHEMOTHERAPY FOR LUNG-CANCER
    SAIJO, N
    EGUCHI, K
    ETOU, H
    MIYACHI, S
    MORINARI, H
    NAKADA, K
    NODA, K
    OHKUNI, Y
    WATANABE, K
    YAMADA, Y
    KABE, J
    KUDO, S
    MANO, K
    MORINARI, H
    TANAKA, T
    UZAWA, T
    OHE, Y
    TAMURA, T
    SASAKI, Y
    SHINKAI, T
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1994, 21 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [26] GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR FOR CANCER-TREATMENT
    CEBON, JS
    LIESCHKE, GJ
    ONCOLOGY, 1994, 51 (02) : 177 - 188
  • [27] EFFECTS OF GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR ON WOUND CONTRACTION
    ROBSON, M
    KUCUKCELEBI, A
    CARP, SS
    HAYWARD, PG
    HUI, PS
    COWAN, WT
    KO, F
    COOPER, DM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1994, 13 : S41 - S46
  • [28] Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Have Differential Effects on Neonatal and Adult Neutrophil Survival and Function
    Eleanor J Molloy
    Amanda J O'Neill
    Julie J Grantham
    Margaret Sheridan-Pereira
    John M Fitzpatrick
    David W Webb
    R William G Watson
    Pediatric Research, 2005, 57 : 806 - 812
  • [29] EFFECTS OF GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN BURN PATIENTS
    CIOFFI, WG
    BURLESON, DG
    JORDAN, BS
    BECKER, WK
    MCMANUS, WF
    MASON, AD
    PRUITT, BA
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1991, 126 (01) : 74 - 79
  • [30] CLINICAL ROLE OF GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR
    MITSUYASU, RT
    GOLDE, DW
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1989, 3 (03) : 411 - 425