What Is the Success of Implants Placed in Fibula Flap? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Gangwani, Pooja [1 ]
Almana, Mohammed [2 ]
Barmak, Basir [3 ]
Kolokythas, Antonia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Rochester, NY USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Dept Gen Dent, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Dept Clin Res & Biostat, Rochester, NY USA
来源
关键词
dental implants; free tissue flaps; mandibular reconstruction; meta-analysis; prostheses and implants; vascular graft occlusion; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OSTEOSEPTOCUTANEOUS FREE-FLAP; OSSEOINTEGRATED DENTAL IMPLANTS; NECK-CANCER-PATIENTS; MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; MAXILLOMANDIBULAR DEFECTS; ORAL REHABILITATION; ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; CONTINUITY DEFECTS; TREATMENT OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5037/jomr.2022.13103
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the success rate of osseointegrated dental implants placed secondarily in fibula free flaps using the Albrektsson and colleagues criteria. Material and Methods: A computerized database search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL. Specific ascertainment criteria were applied for the inclusion of the eligible studies. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis PRISMA checklist. Risk of bias was assessed for all the included studies. Results: The meta-analysis was carried using ten studies that met the inclusion criteria. The present review pooled data obtained from 242 patients (167 males and 75 females), with the age range of 13 to 79 years. A total of 848 dental implants were placed in the free fibula flaps. All dental implants were placed in a delayed fashion, ranging from 14 to 192 months. The estimated proportion of successful implants placed in fibula flaps used to reconstruct the maxillomandibular complex was 0.94 or 94% (95% CI [confidence interval] = 0.91 to 0.96]) with an insignificant heterogeneity of 37%, P = 0.12. Using a random effect model the annual implant failure rate was 0.02 with a 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.03. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis strongly indicate that using objective criteria, delayed implant placement in free fibula flaps is highly successful.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Immediate Loading of Post-Extraction Implants: Success and Survival Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rojas-Rojas, Pastora del Pilar
    Gracia-Rojas, Andrea
    Traboulsi-Garet, Bassel
    Sanchez-Garces, Ma Angeles
    Toledano-Serrabona, Jorge
    Gay-Escoda, Cosme
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (23):
  • [42] Preoperative Angiography for Free Fibula Flap Harvest: A Meta-Analysis
    Alolabi, Noor
    Dickson, Lisa
    Coroneos, Christopher James
    Farrokhyar, Forough
    Levis, Carolyn
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2019, 35 (05) : 362 - 371
  • [43] Flap reconstruction for sacrectomy defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Asaad, Malke
    Rajesh, Aashish
    Wahood, Waseem
    Vyas, Krishna S.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    Rose, Peter S.
    Moran, Steven L.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2020, 73 (02): : 255 - 268
  • [44] Clinical outcomes of pterygoid implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Araujo, Rafael Zetehaku
    Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira
    Cardoso, Camila Lopes
    Benites Condezo, Anthony Froy
    Moreira Junior, Rosenvaldo
    Curi, Marcos Martins
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (04) : 651 - 660
  • [45] Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohseni, Parvin
    Soufi, Ahmad
    Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [46] Dental implants in growing patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elagib, Mohamed Fadul A.
    Alqaysi, Moayad Abdullah H.
    Almushayt, Mussab Omar S.
    Nagate, Raghavendra Reddy
    Gokhale, Shankar T.
    Chaturvedi, Saurabh
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2023, 31 (03) : 1051 - 1064
  • [47] Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    de Medeiros, F. C. F. L.
    Kudo, G. A. H.
    Leme, B. G.
    Saraiva, P. P.
    Verri, F. R.
    Honorio, H. M.
    Pellizzer, E. P.
    Santiago Junior, J. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (04) : 480 - 491
  • [48] Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schiegnitz, Eik
    Al-Nawas, Bilal
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 : 21 - 40
  • [49] Dental implants in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Duttenhoefer, Fabian
    Fuessinger, Marc Anton
    Beckmann, Yasmin
    Schmelzeisen, Rainer
    Groetz, Knut A.
    Boeker, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [50] Diabetes Mellitus and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Al Ansari, Yasmin
    Shahwan, Halime
    Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (09)