What Is the Success of Implants Placed in Fibula Flap? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Gangwani, Pooja [1 ]
Almana, Mohammed [2 ]
Barmak, Basir [3 ]
Kolokythas, Antonia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Rochester, NY USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Dept Gen Dent, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Dept Clin Res & Biostat, Rochester, NY USA
来源
关键词
dental implants; free tissue flaps; mandibular reconstruction; meta-analysis; prostheses and implants; vascular graft occlusion; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OSTEOSEPTOCUTANEOUS FREE-FLAP; OSSEOINTEGRATED DENTAL IMPLANTS; NECK-CANCER-PATIENTS; MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; MAXILLOMANDIBULAR DEFECTS; ORAL REHABILITATION; ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; CONTINUITY DEFECTS; TREATMENT OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5037/jomr.2022.13103
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the success rate of osseointegrated dental implants placed secondarily in fibula free flaps using the Albrektsson and colleagues criteria. Material and Methods: A computerized database search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL. Specific ascertainment criteria were applied for the inclusion of the eligible studies. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis PRISMA checklist. Risk of bias was assessed for all the included studies. Results: The meta-analysis was carried using ten studies that met the inclusion criteria. The present review pooled data obtained from 242 patients (167 males and 75 females), with the age range of 13 to 79 years. A total of 848 dental implants were placed in the free fibula flaps. All dental implants were placed in a delayed fashion, ranging from 14 to 192 months. The estimated proportion of successful implants placed in fibula flaps used to reconstruct the maxillomandibular complex was 0.94 or 94% (95% CI [confidence interval] = 0.91 to 0.96]) with an insignificant heterogeneity of 37%, P = 0.12. Using a random effect model the annual implant failure rate was 0.02 with a 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.03. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis strongly indicate that using objective criteria, delayed implant placement in free fibula flaps is highly successful.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term survival and success rate of dental implants placed in reconstructed areas with extraoral autogenous bone grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moraschini, Vittorio
    Louro, Rafael Seabra
    Son, Andrea
    Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
    Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina
    Shibli, Jamil Awad
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (03) : 469 - 481
  • [32] Survival and success of endocrowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Al-Dabbagh, Raghad A.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 125 (03): : 415.e1 - 415.e9
  • [33] Zygomatic implants placed in atrophic maxilla: an overview of current systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Ramezanzade, Shaqayeq
    Yates, Julian
    Tuminelli, Frank J.
    Keyhan, Seied Omid
    Yousefi, Parisa
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose
    MAXILLOFACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 43 (01)
  • [34] Computer-Assisted versus Conventional Freehand Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Powcharoen, Warit
    Yang, Wei-fa
    Li, Kar Yan
    Zhu, Wangyong
    Su, Yu-xiong
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (06) : 1417 - 1428
  • [35] Computer-Assisted versus Conventional Freehand Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ince, Bilsev
    Ismayilzade, Majid
    Dadaci, Mehmet
    Zuhal, Erdem
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (05) : 686E - 687E
  • [36] Zygomatic implants placed in atrophic maxilla: an overview of current systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Shaqayeq Ramezanzade
    Julian Yates
    Frank J. Tuminelli
    Seied Omid Keyhan
    Parisa Yousefi
    Jose Lopez-Lopez
    Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 43
  • [37] The Versatility of the DCIA Free Flap: A Forgotten Flap? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Escandon, Joseph M.
    Bustos, Valeria P.
    Escandon, Lauren
    Santamaria, Eric
    Gaxiola-Garcia, Miguel A.
    Kushida-Contreras, Beatriz H.
    Forte, Antonio J.
    Ciudad, Pedro
    Langstein, Howard N.
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2022, 38 (05) : 378 - 389
  • [38] The versatility of the scapular free flap: A workhorse flap? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Escobar-Domingo, Maria J.
    Bustos, Valeria P.
    Akintayo, Rachel
    Mahmoud, Amir-Ala
    Fanning, James E.
    Foppiani, Jose A.
    Miller, Amitai S.
    Cauley, Ryan P.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    MICROSURGERY, 2024, 44 (05)
  • [39] Comparing success of immediate versus delay loading of implants in fresh sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eini, Ebrahim
    Yousefimanesh, Hojatollah
    Ashtiani, Alireza Hashemi
    Saki-Malehi, Amal
    Olapour, Amin
    Rahim, Fakher
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2022, 26 (02): : 185 - 194
  • [40] Comparing success of immediate versus delay loading of implants in fresh sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ebrahim Eini
    Hojatollah Yousefimanesh
    Alireza Hashemi Ashtiani
    Amal Saki-Malehi
    Amin Olapour
    Fakher Rahim
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 26 : 185 - 194