Sensitivity to salience: linguistic vs. visual cues affect sentence processing and pronoun resolution

被引:3
|
作者
Burmester, Juliane [1 ]
Sauermann, Antje [2 ]
Spalek, Katharina [3 ]
Wartenburger, Isabell [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Cognit Sci, Dept Linguist, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Ctr Gen Linguist ZAS, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Dept German Language & Linguist, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Topic status; eye gaze; visual context; reading times; antecedent choice; REFERRING EXPRESSIONS; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; MENTAL MODELS; CONTEXT; COMPREHENSION; ATTENTION; SUBJECT; GAZE; PROMINENCE; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1080/23273798.2018.1428758
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Sentence comprehension is optimised by indicating entities as salient through linguistic (i.e., information-structural) or visual means. We compare how salience of a depicted referent due to a linguistic (i.e., topic status) or visual cue (i.e., a virtual person's gaze shift) modulates sentence comprehension in German. We investigated processing of sentences with varying word order and pronoun resolution by means of self-paced reading and an antecedent choice task, respectively. Our results show that linguistic as well as visual salience cues immediately speeded up reading times of sentences mentioning the salient referent first. In contrast, for pronoun resolution, linguistic and visual cues modulated antecedent choice preferences less congruently. In sum, our findings speak in favour of a significant impact of linguistic and visual salience cues on sentence comprehension, substantiating that salient information delivered via language as well as the visual environment is integrated in the current mental representation of the discourse.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 801
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Partisan Affect of News Seekers vs. Gatekeepers: Linguistic Differences in Online vs. Front-Page News in Campaign 2012
    Stephens, Maegan
    Jarvis, Sharon E.
    [J]. COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2016, 33 (03) : 275 - 280
  • [22] Sentence Processing Among Native vs. Nonnative Speakers: Implications for Critical Period Hypothesis
    Nezakat-Alhossaini, Marzieh
    Youhanaee, Manijeh
    Moinzadeh, Ahmad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2014, 5 (02): : 57 - 77
  • [23] Sentence comprehension deficits in Alzheimer's disease: A comparison of off-line vs. on-line sentence processing
    Kempler, D
    Almor, A
    Tyler, LK
    Andersen, ES
    MacDonald, MC
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 64 (03) : 297 - 316
  • [24] Integration of Social Context vs. Linguistic Reference During Situated Language Processing
    Maquate, Katja
    Knoeferle, Pia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [25] Visual cues in VR for guiding attention vs. restoring attention after a short distraction
    Woodworth, Jason W.
    Borst, Christoph W.
    [J]. Computers and Graphics (Pergamon), 2024, 118 : 194 - 209
  • [26] Sleepy vs. Sleeping: Preschoolers' Sensitivity to Morphological Cues for Adjectives and Verbs in English and French
    Song, Lulu
    Nazzi, Thierry
    Moukawane, Sanaa
    Golinkoff, Roberta M.
    Stahl, Aimee
    Ma, Weiyi
    Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy
    Connell, Meaghan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 34TH ANNUAL BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2010, : 409 - +
  • [27] Visual cues in VR for guiding attention vs. restoring attention after a short distraction
    Woodworth, Jason W.
    Borst, Christoph W.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS-UK, 2024, 118 : 194 - 209
  • [28] Competitive guidance cues affect fibroblast cell alignment: Electric fields vs. contact guidance
    Gibson, IR
    McCaig, CD
    [J]. NANOSCALE MATERIALS SCIENCE IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2005, 845 : 31 - 36
  • [29] Cognitive-linguistic effort in multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation: Decreasing vs. increasing cues for word retrieval
    Choe, Yu-kyong
    Foster, Tammie
    Asselin, Abigail
    LeVander, Meagan
    Baird, Jennifer
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 27 (03) : 318 - 348
  • [30] Understanding Visual Information Processing for American vs. Saudi Arabian Users
    Alqahtani, Yahya
    Chakraborty, Joyram
    McGuire, Michael
    Feng, Jinjuan Heidi
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DESIGN FOR INCLUSION, 2020, 954 : 229 - 238