Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: political, social and corporate influences

被引:37
|
作者
Parsa, Sepideh [1 ]
Dai, Narisa [2 ]
Belal, Ataur [3 ]
Li, Teng [4 ]
Tang, Guliang [2 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, Accounting & Finance Dept, London, England
[2] Univ Int Business & Econ, Dept Accounting, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Univ Management Sch, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Newcastle Univ, Dept Accounting, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
authoritarian CSR; CSR reporting; China; institutional theory; STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES; EMERGING COUNTRY; CSR; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1080/00014788.2020.1780110
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper explores the main drivers of CSR and its reporting for large Chinese listed companies, and identifies the key institutional pressures and stakeholder influences that shape CSR and its reporting. The data were collected through interviews with managers from large listed Chinese companies. Our findings reveal how the Chinese government uses social organisations and social intermediaries to facilitate and mediate CSR and its reporting to meet changing societal expectations across regions, while ensuring that companies remain responsive to the expectations of international stakeholders. We find that CSR and its reporting help companies gain political legitimacy domestically, while retaining their legitimacy in global markets. Companies co-operate with social organisations and social intermediaries actively and continuously. This helped companies secure political legitimacy with the government, while helping officials maintain their social legitimacy. Our findings on regional differences support the idea that relations between Chinese business and society have a fundamental effect on CSR and its reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 64
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Managing corporate social responsibility in China
    Tian, Xiaowen
    Slocum, John W.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2016, 45 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [42] A Study of the Corporate Social Responsibility in China
    You Miao
    Zeng Jianhua
    [J]. MOT2009: PROCEEDINGS OF ZHENGZHOU CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 679 - 682
  • [43] Evolving Corporate Social Responsibility in China
    Zhang, Dongyong
    Morse, Stephen
    Kambhamptati, Uma
    Li, Bingjun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (11) : 7646 - 7665
  • [44] Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Corporate Financial Performance: To Be Linked or Not To Be Linked?
    Strouhal, Jiri
    Gurvits, Natalja
    Startseva, Emilia
    Nikitina-Kalamae, Monika
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF FIRMS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: 10TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE, PTS I-IV, 2015, : 1226 - 1233
  • [45] Corporate board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility reporting in Malaysia
    Ahmad, Nurulyasmin Binti Ju
    Rashid, Afzalur
    Gow, Jeff
    [J]. GENDER TECHNOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 22 (02): : 87 - 108
  • [46] Corporate social responsibility influences employee engagement
    Tsourvakas, Georgios
    Yfantidou, Ioanna
    [J]. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2018, 14 (01) : 123 - 137
  • [47] CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
    Hedva, Vinarski-Peretz
    [J]. GLOBAL AND NATIONAL BUSINESS THEORIES AND PRACTICE: BRIDGING THE PAST WITH THE FUTURE, 2017, : 2400 - 2402
  • [48] The Influence of Corporate Governance and Corporate Foundations on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting Practices
    Ramdhony, Dineshwar
    Rashid, Afzalur
    Gow, Jeff
    Soobaroyen, Teerooven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN BUSINESS, 2022, 23 (03) : 816 - 832
  • [49] Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Evidence from China
    Liu Jihan
    Wang Jianqiong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EURO-ASIA CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND CSR: TOURISM, SOCIETY AND EDUCATION SESSION (PT I), 2013, : 185 - 192
  • [50] Political corporate social responsibility in authoritarian contexts
    Maier, Anna-Lena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS POLICY, 2021, 4 (04) : 476 - 495