Factors influencing taper failure of modular revision hip stems

被引:20
|
作者
Krull, A. [1 ]
Morlock, M. M. [1 ]
Bishop, N. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] TUHH Hamburg Univ Technol, Inst Biomech, Denickestr 15, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
[2] HAW Hamburg Univ Appl Sci, Dept Biomed Engn, Fak Life Sci, Ulmenliet 20, D-21033 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Hip revision; Taper junction; Fracture; Corrosion; Fatigue; Strength; Titanium; Finite element model; Surface damage; HEAD-NECK TAPER; FRETTING CORROSION; CONTACT FORCES; FEMORAL STEMS; ARTHROPLASTY; FRACTURE; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS; JUNCTION; JOINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.02.001
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Stem modularity of revision hip implant systems offers the advantage of the restoration of individual patient geometry but introduces additional interfaces, which are subjected to repetitive bending loading and have a propensity for fretting corrosion. The male stem taper is the weakest part of the modular junction due to its reduced cross section compared to the outside diameter of the stem. Taper fractures can be the consequence of overloading in combination with corrosion. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of implant design factors, patient factors, and surgical factors on the risk of taper failure of the modular junction of revision stems. An analytical bending model was used to estimate the strength of the taper connection for pristine, fatigued and corroded conditions. Additionally, a finite element contact model of the taper connection was developed to assess the relative motion and potential for surface damage at the taper interface under physiological loading for varyied assembly and design parameters. Increasing the male taper diameter was shown to be the most effective means for increasing taper strength but would require a concurrent increase in the outer implant diameter to limit a greater risk of total surface damage for a thinner female taper wall. Increasing the assembly force decreases the total surface damage but not local magnitudes, which are probably responsible for crack initiation. It is suggested that in unfavourable loading conditions a monobloc implant system will reduce the risk of failure. (C) 2018 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Titanium modular stems in total hip arthroplasty due to developmental dysplasia: a registry comparison with single-taper implants
    Castagnini, Francesco
    Cosentino, Monica
    Bordini, Barbara
    Montalti, Maurizio
    Biondi, Federico
    Faldini, Cesare
    Traina, Francesco
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 33 (05) : 916 - 924
  • [42] Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Ouanezar, Herve
    Jalaguier, Thomas
    Franck, Florent
    Pibarot, Vincent
    Bothorel, Hugo
    Saffarini, Mo
    Piton, Jean-Pierre
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (05)
  • [43] What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Huang, Yong
    Zhou, Yixin
    Shao, Hongyi
    Gu, Jianming
    Tang, Hao
    Tang, Qiheng
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (10): : 3108 - 3113
  • [44] Is There a Difference Between Modular Versus Monoblock Femoral Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Shahi, Alisina
    Bezwada, Hari
    Kendoff, Daniel
    Sadek, Fouad
    Duran, Margarita Veloso
    Winkler, Heinz
    Wang, Weijun
    Zhang, Xiaogang
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (02): : s171 - s172
  • [45] Development of hip joint prostheses with modular stems
    Bae, Ji-Yong
    Farooque, Umar
    Lee, Kyung-won
    Kim, Gyu-Ha
    Jeon, Insu
    Yoon, Taek-Rim
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2011, 43 (09) : 1173 - 1180
  • [46] Primary total hip arthroplasty with modular stems
    Keggi, Kristaps J.
    Kennon, Robert E.
    Keggi, John M.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2008, 19 (02): : 124 - 126
  • [47] Modular Taper Junction Corrosion and Failure: How to Approach a Recalled Total Hip Arthroplasty Implant
    Pivec, Robert
    Meneghini, R. Michael
    Hozack, William J.
    Westrich, Geoffrey H.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [48] Evaluation of the Painful Dual Taper Modular Neck Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: Do They All Require Revision?
    Kwon, Young-Min
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (07): : 1385 - 1389
  • [49] Repeatable procedure for evaluating taper damage on femoral stems with modular necks
    Harman, Melinda K.
    Baleani, Massimiliano
    Juda, Kacper
    Viceconti, Marco
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2011, 99B (02) : 431 - 439
  • [50] The survivorship of revision total hip replacement with severe proximal bone deficiency using a modular taper fluted prosthesis
    Govilkar, Siddharth
    Gandhi, Maulik J.
    Bhachu, Davinder S.
    Whittaker, John-Paul
    Evans, Christopher R.
    Spencer-Jones, Richard
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2022, 88 (02): : 303 - 309