Variant Callers for Next-Generation Sequencing Data: A Comparison Study

被引:112
|
作者
Liu, Xiangtao [1 ,2 ]
Han, Shizhong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zuoheng [3 ]
Gelernter, Joel [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Yang, Bao-Zhu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Div Human Genet, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] VA CT Hlth Care Ctr, West Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Genet, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurobiol, New Haven, CT USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MAPREDUCE; FRAMEWORK; GENOTYPE; FORMAT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0075619
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Next generation sequencing (NGS) has been leading the genetic study of human disease into an era of unprecedented productivity. Many bioinformatics pipelines have been developed to call variants from NGS data. The performance of these pipelines depends crucially on the variant caller used and on the calling strategies implemented. We studied the performance of four prevailing callers, SAMtools, GATK, glftools and Atlas2, using single-sample and multiple-sample variant-calling strategies. Using the same aligner, BWA, we built four single-sample and three multiple-sample calling pipelines and applied the pipelines to whole exome sequencing data taken from 20 individuals. We obtained genotypes generated by Illumina Infinium HumanExome v1.1 Beadchip for validation analysis and then used Sanger sequencing as a "gold-standard" method to resolve discrepancies for selected regions of high discordance. Finally, we compared the sensitivity of three of the single-sample calling pipelines using known simulated whole genome sequence data as a gold standard. Overall, for single-sample calling, the called variants were highly consistent across callers and the pairwise overlapping rate was about 0.9. Compared with other callers, GATK had the highest rediscovery rate (0.9969) and specificity (0.99996), and the Ti/Tv ratio out of GATK was closest to the expected value of 3.02. Multiple-sample calling increased the sensitivity. Results from the simulated data suggested that GATK outperformed SAMtools and glfSingle in sensitivity, especially for low coverage data. Further, for the selected discrepant regions evaluated by Sanger sequencing, variant genotypes called by exome sequencing versus the exome array were more accurate, although the average variant sensitivity and overall genotype consistency rate were as high as 95.87% and 99.82%, respectively. In conclusion, GATK showed several advantages over other variant callers for general purpose NGS analyses. The GATK pipelines we developed perform very well.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Next-generation sequencing of the next generation
    Darren J. Burgess
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2011, 12 : 78 - 79
  • [22] Pathway analysis with next-generation sequencing data
    Jinying Zhao
    Yun Zhu
    Eric Boerwinkle
    Momiao Xiong
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2015, 23 : 507 - 515
  • [23] Identification of indels in next-generation sequencing data
    Ratan, Aakrosh
    Olson, Thomas L.
    Loughran, Thomas P., Jr.
    Miller, Webb
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 16
  • [24] Visualizing next-generation sequencing data with JBrowse
    Westesson, Oscar
    Skinner, Mitchell
    Holmes, Ian
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [25] Focus on next-generation sequencing data analysis
    Rusk N.
    Nature Methods, 2009, 6 (Suppl 11) : S1 - S1
  • [26] Next-generation sequencing: adjusting to data overload
    Monya Baker
    Nature Methods, 2010, 7 : 495 - 499
  • [27] Next-generation sequencing: adjusting to data overload
    Baker, Monya
    NATURE METHODS, 2010, 7 (07) : 495 - 499
  • [28] Applications and data analysis of next-generation sequencing
    Vogl, Ina
    Benet-Pages, Anna
    Eck, Sebastian H.
    Kuhn, Marius
    Vosberg, Sebastian
    Greif, Philipp A.
    Metzeler, Klaus H.
    Biskup, Saskia
    Mueller-Reible, Clemens
    Klein, Hanns-Georg
    LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 37 (06): : 305 - 315
  • [29] Identification of indels in next-generation sequencing data
    Aakrosh Ratan
    Thomas L Olson
    Thomas P Loughran
    Webb Miller
    BMC Bioinformatics, 16
  • [30] Next-generation sequencing and the evolution of data sharing
    de Macena Sobreira, Nara Lygia
    Hamosh, Ada
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2021, 185 (09) : 2633 - 2635