Physical strain while wearing personal radiation protection systems in interventional radiology

被引:4
|
作者
Koenig, Alexander M. [1 ]
Schweer, Anna [1 ]
Sasse, Daniel [1 ]
Etzel, Robin [2 ]
Apitzsch, Jonas [3 ]
Viniol, Simon [1 ]
Thomas, Rohit P. [1 ]
Mahnken, Andreas H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Clin Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Marburg, Germany
[2] Mittelhessen Univ Appl Sci, Inst Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Giessen, Germany
[3] Helios Clin Pforzheim, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Pforzheim, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 07期
关键词
3D BACK SHAPE; CARDIOLOGISTS; SHOULDER; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0271664
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives Multiple studies show orthopedic health problems for medical staff due to wearing radiation protection aprons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the weight pressure on the shoulder as a marker of physical strain caused by different radiation-protection devices. Methods For the weight pressure measurement, a pressure sensor (OMD-30-SE-100N, OptoForce, Budapest, Hungary) placed on the left and right shoulder was used. Wearing different radiation protection systems the force measurement system was used to quantify the weight pressure. Measurements were acquired in still standing position and during various movements. Results A mean significant decreasing weight pressure on the shoulder between 74% and 84% (p<0.001) was measured, when the free-hanging radiation protection system was used in comparison to one-piece and two-piece radiation protection aprons and coats. Using two-piece radiation protection aprons, the weight pressure was significantly lower than that of one-piece radiation protection coats. If a belt was used for the one-piece radiation protection coat, the weight pressure on the shoulder was reduced by 32.5% (p = 0.003). For a two-piece radiation protection apron and a one-piece radiation protection coat (with and without belt) a significant different weight pressure distribution between the right and left shoulder could be measured. Conclusions The free-hanging radiation protection system showed a significant lower weight pressure in comparison to the other radiation protection devices. Apart from this, use of a two-piece radiation protection apron or addition of a belt to a radiation protection coat proved to be further effective options to reduce weight pressure.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimization of Radiation Protection in Pediatric Interventional Radiology in Latin America and the Caribbean: Development, Advancements, Challenges and Achievements of the OPRIPALC Program
    Ubeda, Carlos
    Vano, Elise
    Perez, Maria
    Jimenez, Pablo
    van Deventer, Emilie
    Ramirez, Raul
    Nader, Alejandro
    Miranda, Patricia
    [J]. CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (12):
  • [42] Efficiency of radiation protection equipment in interventional radiology: a systematic Monte Carlo study of eye lens and whole body doses
    Koukorava, C.
    Farah, J.
    Struelens, L.
    Clairand, I.
    Donadille, L.
    Vanhavere, F.
    Dimitriou, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2014, 34 (03) : 509 - 528
  • [43] Better safe than so ray: national survey of radiation protection amongst interventional radiology trainees in the United Kingdom
    Patel, S.
    Jenkins, P.
    Zhong, J.
    Liu, W.
    Harborne, K.
    Modi, S.
    Joy, C.
    Williams, R.
    Haslam, P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 96 (1149):
  • [44] Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study
    Kato, Mamoru
    Chida, Koichi
    Munehisa, Masato
    Sato, Tadaya
    Inaba, Yohei
    Suzuki, Masatoshi
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [46] Visualization of spatial dose distribution for effective radiation protection education in interventional radiology: obtaining high-accuracy spatial doses
    Mori, Yutaro
    Isobe, Tomonori
    Ide, Yasuwo
    Uematsu, Shuto
    Tomita, Tetsuya
    Nagai, Yoshiaki
    Iizumi, Takashi
    Takei, Hideyuki
    Sakurai, Hideyuki
    Sakae, Takeji
    [J]. PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [47] Use of personal radiation protection tools and individual dosimetric monitoring in a sample of interventional cardiologists in France, 2005-2009
    Jacob, S.
    Scanff, P.
    Bertrand, A.
    Laurier, D.
    Bernier, M. -O.
    [J]. RADIOPROTECTION, 2014, 49 (04) : 257 - 260
  • [48] Physician-received scatter radiation with angiography systems used for interventional radiology: comparison among many X-ray systems
    Chida, Koichi
    Morishima, Yoshiaki
    Inaba, Youhei
    Taura, Masaaki
    Ebata, Ayako
    Takeda, Ken
    Shimura, Hirotaka
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 149 (04) : 410 - 416
  • [49] Selected germanate glass systems with robust physical features for radiation protection material use
    Kaky, Kawa M.
    Sayyed, M. I.
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2024, 215
  • [50] Occupational radiation dose to eyes from interventional radiology procedures in light of the new eye lens dose limit from the International Commission on Radiological Protection
    O'Connor, U.
    Walsh, C.
    Gallagher, A.
    Dowling, A.
    Guiney, M.
    Ryan, J. M.
    McEniff, N.
    O'Reilly, G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1049):