Gas hold-up in three phase co-current bubble columns

被引:27
|
作者
Kumar, S. [1 ]
Kumar, R. A. [1 ]
Munshi, P. [2 ]
Khanna, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kanpur, Dept Chem Engn, Kanpur 208016, UP, India
[2] IIT Kanpur, Dept Mech Engn, Kanpur 208016, UP, India
来源
CHISA 2012 | 2012年 / 42卷
关键词
Bubble column; three phase flow; solid effect; co-current flows; gas hold-up; LIQUID-SOLID SUSPENSIONS; FLOW REGIME TRANSITION; ELEVATED PRESSURE; SLURRY CONCENTRATIONS; SPARGED REACTORS; RISE VELOCITY; HEAT-TRANSFER; HYDRODYNAMICS; DESIGN; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.470
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Bubble columns are used in a large number of applications in chemical engineering. The important variables that affect the gas holdup, bubble dynamics and flow regime in a bubble column are gas and liquid velocities, liquid viscosity, liquid surface tension, design of the gas distributor, solid concentration and column diameter. Experiments have been performed in a 15 cm diameter co-current slurry bubble column with liquid phase as water and air as the gas phase. Glass beads of mean diameter 35 mu m have been used as solid phase. Solid loading up to 9% has been used. The superficial gas velocity varies from 1.0 to 16.28 cm/s and superficial liquid velocity varies from 0 to 12.26 cm/s. Effects of liquid height, liquid velocity, gas velocity and solid concentration over gas holdup for both two and three phase co-current flows have been studied. For batch case the liquid height didn't affect the gas holdup. The gas holdup increases with increase in gas velocity for both two and three phase co-current columns. For two phase and three phase flow up to 1% solid loading; at low superficial gas velocity i.e. in the homogeneous regime, the increase in liquid velocity doesn't show any change in the gas holdup. For higher gas velocities i.e. in the heterogeneous regime, increase in liquid velocity decreases the gas holdup rapidly. Above 1% solid loading, liquid velocity effect over gas hold-up is negligible. With increase in solid concentration for co-current bubble column the gas holdup slightly increases or remains constant up to 5% loading; beyond this loading there is a significant decrease in gas holdup. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 794
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of operating pressure on the gas hold-up in bubble columns for high viscous media
    Urseanu, MI
    Guit, RPM
    Stankiewicz, A
    van Kranenburg, G
    Lommen, JHGM
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2003, 58 (3-6) : 697 - 704
  • [32] VARIATION OF GAS HOLD-UP IN BUBBLE COLUMNS WITH PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF LIQUIDS AND OPERATING PARAMETERS OF COLUMNS.
    Bach, Hans F.
    Pilhofer, Theo
    1978, 1 (05): : 270 - 275
  • [33] Gamma ray tomography - An experimental analysis of fractional gas hold-up in bubble columns
    Patel, Ashutosh K.
    Thorat, Bhaskar N.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2008, 137 (02) : 376 - 385
  • [34] GAS HOLD-UP AND MASS-TRANSFER CHARACTERISTICS OF PACKED BUBBLE-COLUMNS
    SAWANT, SB
    PANGARKAR, VG
    JOSHI, JB
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL AND THE BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1979, 18 (02): : 143 - 149
  • [35] Measurement of gas hold-up in bubble columns from low frequency acoustic emissions
    Boyd, JWR
    Varley, J
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2002, 88 (1-3) : 111 - 118
  • [36] COMPARISON OF GAS HOLD-UP PROFILES IN CO-CURRENT, COUNTER-CURRENT AND BATCH BUBBLE COLUMN REACTORS MEASURED USING GAMMA DENSITOMETRY AND SURFACE OF REVOLUTION METHOD
    Hernandez-Alvarado, Freddy
    Kalaga, Dinesh V.
    Banerjee, Sanjoy
    Kawaji, Masahiro
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME FLUIDS ENGINEERING DIVISION SUMMER MEETING, 2016, VOL 1B, 2016,
  • [37] Gas hold-up, liquid circulation and gas-liquid mass transfer in slurry bubble columns
    Gavroy, D.
    Joly-Vuillemin, C.
    Cordier, G.
    Delmas, H.
    Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1995, 73 (A6) : 637 - 642
  • [38] MIXING CHARACTERISTICS AND GAS HOLD-UP OF A BUBBLE COLUMN
    GUY, C
    CARREAU, PJ
    PARIS, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1986, 64 (01): : 23 - 35
  • [39] Flow behaviour and gas hold-up in two-phase bubble column
    Pradhan, A.K.
    Parichha, R.K.
    De, P.
    Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), Part CH: Chemical Engineering Division, 1991, 72 (01):
  • [40] Effect of sparger design and height to diameter ratio on fractional gas hold-up in bubble columns
    Thorat, BN
    Shevade, AV
    Bhilegaonkar, KN
    Aglawe, RH
    Veera, UP
    Thakre, SS
    Pandit, AB
    Sawant, SB
    Joshi, JB
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 1998, 76 (A7): : 823 - 834