Gas hold-up in three phase co-current bubble columns

被引:27
|
作者
Kumar, S. [1 ]
Kumar, R. A. [1 ]
Munshi, P. [2 ]
Khanna, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kanpur, Dept Chem Engn, Kanpur 208016, UP, India
[2] IIT Kanpur, Dept Mech Engn, Kanpur 208016, UP, India
来源
CHISA 2012 | 2012年 / 42卷
关键词
Bubble column; three phase flow; solid effect; co-current flows; gas hold-up; LIQUID-SOLID SUSPENSIONS; FLOW REGIME TRANSITION; ELEVATED PRESSURE; SLURRY CONCENTRATIONS; SPARGED REACTORS; RISE VELOCITY; HEAT-TRANSFER; HYDRODYNAMICS; DESIGN; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.470
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Bubble columns are used in a large number of applications in chemical engineering. The important variables that affect the gas holdup, bubble dynamics and flow regime in a bubble column are gas and liquid velocities, liquid viscosity, liquid surface tension, design of the gas distributor, solid concentration and column diameter. Experiments have been performed in a 15 cm diameter co-current slurry bubble column with liquid phase as water and air as the gas phase. Glass beads of mean diameter 35 mu m have been used as solid phase. Solid loading up to 9% has been used. The superficial gas velocity varies from 1.0 to 16.28 cm/s and superficial liquid velocity varies from 0 to 12.26 cm/s. Effects of liquid height, liquid velocity, gas velocity and solid concentration over gas holdup for both two and three phase co-current flows have been studied. For batch case the liquid height didn't affect the gas holdup. The gas holdup increases with increase in gas velocity for both two and three phase co-current columns. For two phase and three phase flow up to 1% solid loading; at low superficial gas velocity i.e. in the homogeneous regime, the increase in liquid velocity doesn't show any change in the gas holdup. For higher gas velocities i.e. in the heterogeneous regime, increase in liquid velocity decreases the gas holdup rapidly. Above 1% solid loading, liquid velocity effect over gas hold-up is negligible. With increase in solid concentration for co-current bubble column the gas holdup slightly increases or remains constant up to 5% loading; beyond this loading there is a significant decrease in gas holdup. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 794
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HOLD-UP PREDICTION IN PACKED COLUMNS FOR CO-CURRENT GAS-LIQUID DOWNFLOW
    REYNIER, JP
    CHARPENT.JC
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1971, 26 (10) : 1781 - &
  • [2] GAS HOLD-UP IN BUBBLE-COLUMNS
    HIKITA, H
    ASAI, S
    TANIGAWA, K
    SEGAWA, K
    KITAO, M
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL AND THE BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1980, 20 (01): : 59 - 67
  • [3] GAS HOLD-UP AND AXIAL MIXING IN FLUID PHASE OF BUBBLE COLUMNS
    REITH, T
    RENKEN, S
    ISRAEL, BA
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1968, 23 (06) : 619 - &
  • [4] A gas hold-up model for slurry bubble columns
    Singh, Chattarbir
    van der Schaaf, John
    Kuster, Ben F. M.
    Schouten, Jaap C.
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2007, 53 (07) : 1687 - 1702
  • [5] PREDICTIONS OF GAS HOLD-UP IN CIRCULATING BUBBLE COLUMNS.
    Nicol, Ross S.
    Davidson, John F.
    1986, (13):
  • [6] Gas hold-up profiles in foaming liquids in bubble columns
    Veera, UP
    Kataria, KL
    Joshi, JB
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2001, 84 (03) : 247 - 256
  • [7] Effect of surfactants on the gas hold-up in circulating bubble columns
    Nicol, R.S.
    Davidson, J.F.
    Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1988, 66 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [8] Gas hold-up profiles in foaming liquids in bubble columns
    Joshi, J.B. (jbj@udct.ernet.in), 1600, (Elsevier):
  • [9] Effect of drag models on simulation of gas hold-up in bubble columns
    Wu, Zongying
    Yang, Ning
    Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2010, 61 (11): : 2817 - 2822
  • [10] The influence of electrolytes on gas hold-up and regime transition in bubble columns
    Ribeiro, Claudio P., Jr.
    Mewes, Dieter
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (17) : 4501 - 4509