Software Process Improvement Assesment for multimodel environment Tool to diagnose an organization

被引:0
|
作者
Piedad Gasca-Hurtado, Gloria [1 ]
Andres Hincapie, Jesus [1 ]
Munoz, Mirna [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Medellin, UDEM, Fac Ingn, Medellin, Colombia
[2] CIMAT AC, Ctr Invest Matemat, Ave Univ 222, Zacatecas 98068, Zacatecas, Mexico
关键词
software process improvement; multimodel environment; standars; models; software engineering; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Organizations that implement improvement processes to develop quality software usually appeal to SCAMPI-like evaluation methods in order to diagnose, plan and certify themselves. However, nowadays there is a need that goes beyond the evaluation, and it is the need to diagnose the processes maturity of the software development organizations that use more than one process improvement model or standard, i.e. a multi-model environment. Implementing a multi-model environment for software process improvement is not an easy task since it demands the harmonization of models or standards with dissimilar structures, hence diagnosing the maturity of an organization that defines and implements a multi-model environment it not an easy task either. This work depicts a software tool to accomplish a diagnostic of an organization that uses or pretends to define a software process improvement multi-model environment that includes both traditional and agile models and standards. Such diagnostic determines the processes maturity level of an organization and allows us to define a methodology for recommending tools and techniques for software process improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Software Repository for Software Process Improvement
    Park, Eun-Ju
    Kom, Haeng-Kon
    Lee, Roger Y.
    [J]. COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2008, 131 : 51 - 64
  • [32] A software process simulator for software product and process improvement
    Donzelli, P
    Iazeolla, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, 1999, 195 : 525 - 538
  • [33] New software to optimize and diagnose the organization of city sound spaces
    Ji, Qing
    [J]. Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2007, 35 (SUPPL.): : 150 - 153
  • [34] Tuning COCOMO-II for Software Process Improvement: A Tool Based Approach
    Hani, Syeda Umema
    Alam, Abu Turab
    Shaikh, Abdul Basit
    [J]. MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 35 (04) : 505 - 522
  • [35] The Tool Coverage of Software Process Improvement Frameworks for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
    Yesildoruk, Filiz Celik
    Bozlu, Banu
    Demiroers, Onur
    [J]. PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 32 : 290 - 302
  • [36] Towards a Multidimensional Self-assessment for Software Process Improvement: A Pilot Tool
    Georgiadou, Elli
    Berki, Eleni
    Siakas, Kerstin
    Sameh, Samer
    Estdale, John
    Rahanu, Harjinder
    Ross, Margaret
    Messnarz, Richard
    Valtanen, Juri Petri
    [J]. SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, EUROSPI 2021, 2021, 1442 : 164 - 180
  • [37] How to effectively promote the Software Process Improvement activities in a large-scale organization
    Ogasawara, H
    Yamada, A
    Kusanagi, T
    Arami, M
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY - ECSQ 2002, 2002, 2349 : 124 - 134
  • [38] TRIZ for software process improvement
    Stanbrook, T
    [J]. 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 466 - 468
  • [39] The software process improvement research
    Tan Ran
    Zhong Yuan
    Xue Senjun
    [J]. ICCSE'2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE & EDUCATION: ADVANCED COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, NEW EDUCATION, 2006, : 863 - 866
  • [40] The software process: Evaluation and improvement
    Lopez, M
    [J]. WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, 2001, : 255 - 260