Comparison of histological structure and biocompatibility between human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and porcine ADM

被引:70
|
作者
Ge, Liangpeng [1 ]
Zheng, Shuquan [1 ]
Wei, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Mil Med Univ, Dept Lab Anim Sci, Coll Basic Med, Chongqing, Peoples R China
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
ADM; Porcine; Histological structure; Biocompatibility; RATS;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2008.05.007
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The present study was to compare the difference of histological structure and biocompatibility between human ADM and porcine ADM. The scaffold structure, collagen arrangement and collagen structure of human ADM and those of porcine ADM were very similar except for a slight difference in their black and white bands assessed by both light microscopy and electron microscopy. The positive immunohistochemical staining results of porcine ADM using human antibodies of collagen 1, collagen 111, collagen IV, fibronectin, laminin and vimentin and the result of SDS-PAGE implied a strong homology between the main proteins of human ADM and porcine ADM. In addition, statistical analysis indicated that there was no significant difference (P < 0.05) between the biocompatibility of the two ADMs. Based on these results, we conclude that porcine ADM bears a strong similarity to human ADM, and might be a substitute for human ADM in the future. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 50
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bovine versus Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Mechanical Properties
    Adelman, David M.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    Butler, Charles E.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2014, 2 (05)
  • [22] Comparison of porcine and human acellular dermal matrix outcomes in wound healing: a deep dive into the evidence
    Saricilar, Erin Cihat
    Huang, Sarah
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2021, 48 (04): : 433 - 439
  • [23] Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction A Scoping Review
    Pires, Giovanna R.
    Moss, Whitney D.
    Hosein, Ray C.
    Overschmidt, Bo T.
    Magno-Padron, David A.
    Agarwal, Jayant P.
    McFarland, Mary M.
    Casucci, Tallie
    Kwok, Alvin C.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 89 (06) : 694 - 702
  • [24] Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Use Under Mastectomy Flap Necrosis on Perioperative Outcomes of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, So Young
    Bang, Sa Ik
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 41 (02) : 275 - 281
  • [25] A Novel Prehydrated Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Histological and Clinical Evaluation
    van Orten, Andreas
    Goetz, Werner
    Bilhan, Hakan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS, 2024, 2024
  • [26] Comparison of Histological Characteristics of Acellular Dermal Matrix Capsules to Surrounding Breast Capsules in Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Breast Reconstruction
    Yu, Deborah
    Hanna, Kasandra R.
    LeGallo, Robin D.
    Drake, David B.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 76 (05) : 485 - 488
  • [27] Collagen Fibril Structure and Strength in Acellular Dermal Matrix Materials of Bovine, Porcine, and Human Origin
    Wells, Hannah C.
    Sizeland, Katie H.
    Kirby, Nigel
    Hawley, Adrian
    Mudie, Stephen
    Haverkamp, Richard G.
    ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2015, 1 (10): : 1026 - 1038
  • [28] Histological comparison of implanted cadaveric and porcine dermal matrix grafts
    Richter, Gresham T.
    Smith, Jacob E.
    Spencer, Horace J.
    Fan, Chun Y.
    Vural, Emre
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 137 (02) : 239 - 242
  • [29] Vascularization of Novel Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Bian, Donghui
    Chen, Mingrui
    Yu, Renyi
    Liu, Benli
    Zhang, Aijun
    Song, Guodong
    JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY, 2014, 23 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [30] Dermal autografts as a substitute for acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in tissue expander breast reconstruction: A prospective comparative study
    Lynch, Michael P.
    Chung, Michael T.
    Rinker, Brian D.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2013, 66 (11): : 1534 - 1542