Sensitivity Study of Cloud Cover and Ozone Modeling to Microphysics Parameterization

被引:8
|
作者
Walaszek, Kinga [1 ]
Kryza, Maciej [1 ]
Szymanowski, Mariusz [2 ]
Werner, Malgorzata [1 ,3 ]
Ojrzynska, Hanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wroclaw, Dept Climatol & Atmosphere Protect, Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Univ Wroclaw, Dept Geoinformat & Cartog, Wroclaw, Poland
[3] Univ Worcester, Natl Pollen & Aerobiol Res Unit, Worcester, England
关键词
Cloud mask; meteorological modeling; ozone; WRF; Poland; model evaluation; WRF-CHEM CONTRIBUTIONS; SATELLITE; PRECIPITATION; VERIFICATION; TEMPERATURE; PHOTOLYSIS; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1007/s00024-015-1227-2
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Cloud cover is a significant meteorological parameter influencing the amount of solar radiation reaching the ground surface, and therefore affecting the formation of photochemical pollutants, most of all tropospheric ozone (O-3). Because cloud amount and type in meteorological models are resolved by microphysics schemes, adjusting this parameterization is a major factor determining the accuracy of the results. However, verification of cloud cover simulations based on surface data is difficult and yields significant errors. Current meteorological satellite programs provide many high-resolution cloud products, which can be used to verify numerical models. In this study, the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) has been applied for the area of Poland for an episode of June 17th-July 4th, 2008, when high ground-level ozone concentrations were observed. Four simulations were performed, each with a different microphysics parameterization: Purdue Lin, Eta Ferrier, WRF Single-Moment 6-class, and Morrison Double-Moment scheme. The results were then evaluated based on cloud mask satellite images derived from SEVIRI data. Meteorological variables and O-3 concentrations were also evaluated. The results show that the simulation using Morrison Double-Moment microphysics provides the most and Purdue Lin the least accurate information on cloud cover and surface meteorological variables for the selected high ozone episode. Those two configurations were used for WRF-Chem runs, which showed significantly higher O-3 concentrations and better model-measurements agreement of the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 510
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sensitivity analysis of microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes: numerical simulation of cloudbursts over Uttarakhand using WRF modeling system
    Harithasree Devan
    S. K. Panda
    Unashish Mondal
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2024, 155 : 1583 - 1603
  • [32] Sensitivity analysis of microphysics and cumulus parameterization schemes: numerical simulation of cloudbursts over Uttarakhand using WRF modeling system
    Devan, Harithasree
    Panda, S. K.
    Mondal, Unashish
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 155 (03) : 1583 - 1603
  • [33] SENSITIVITY OF SURFACE SOLAR FLUXES TO CLOUD PARAMETERIZATION
    EWING, JA
    PINKER, RT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 1988, 45 (05) : 881 - 884
  • [34] DETAILED AND PARAMETERIZED MODELING OF CLOUD-MICROPHYSICS IN A STATIONARY CLOUD MODEL
    HOLLER, H
    [J]. METEOROLOGISCHE RUNDSCHAU, 1983, 36 (03): : 152 - 154
  • [35] Sensitivity of the results of modeling of seasonal ground freezing to selection of parameterization of the snow cover thermal conductivity
    Pozdniakov, S. P.
    Grinevskyi, S. O.
    Dedulina, E. A.
    Koreko, E. S.
    [J]. LED I SNEG-ICE AND SNOW, 2019, 59 (01): : 67 - 80
  • [36] A study of the effects of cloud processing of aerosol on the microphysics of cloud
    Choularton, TW
    Bower, KN
    Beswick, KM
    Parkin, M
    Kaye, A
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 124 (549) : 1377 - 1389
  • [37] Modeling of Cloud Microphysics: Can We Do Better?
    Grabowski, Wojciech W.
    Morrison, Hugh
    Shima, Shin-Ichiro
    Abade, Gustavo C.
    Dziekan, Piotr
    Pawlowska, Hanna
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 100 (04) : 655 - 672
  • [38] Liquid and ice cloud microphysics in the CSU general circulation model .3. Sensitivity to modeling assumptions
    Fowler, LD
    Randall, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 1996, 9 (03) : 561 - 586
  • [39] NEW RAMS CLOUD MICROPHYSICS PARAMETERIZATION .1. THE SINGLE-MOMENT SCHEME
    WALKO, RL
    COTTON, WR
    MEYERS, MP
    HARRINGTON, JY
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 1995, 38 (1-4) : 29 - 62
  • [40] Recognition of Inter-Cloud Versus Intra-Cloud Controls on Droplet Dispersion With Applications to Microphysics Parameterization
    Hu, Arthur Z.
    Igel, Adele L.
    Chuang, Patrick Y.
    Witte, Mikael K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2021, 126 (18)