Modeling of Cloud Microphysics: Can We Do Better?

被引:109
|
作者
Grabowski, Wojciech W. [1 ]
Morrison, Hugh [1 ]
Shima, Shin-Ichiro [2 ,3 ]
Abade, Gustavo C. [4 ]
Dziekan, Piotr [4 ]
Pawlowska, Hanna [4 ]
机构
[1] NCAR, Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorol Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Univ Hyogo, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[3] RIKEN Ctr Computat Sci, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[4] Univ Warsaw, Fac Phys, Inst Geophys, Warsaw, Poland
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; RESOLVING CONVECTION PARAMETERIZATION; DROPLET SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; SHALLOW CUMULUS; STOCHASTIC COALESCENCE; BIN MICROPHYSICS; PART I; NONPRECIPITATING CLOUDS; ICE MICROPHYSICS; SQUALL LINE;
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0005.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Representation of cloud microphysics is a key aspect of simulating clouds. From the early days of cloud modeling, numerical models have relied on an Eulerian approach for all cloud and thermodynamic and microphysics variables. Over time the sophistication of microphysics schemes has steadily increased, from simple representations of bulk masses of cloud and rain in each grid cell, to including different ice particle types and bulk hydrometeor concentrations, to complex schemes referred to as bin or spectral schemes that explicitly evolve the hydrometeor size distributions within each model grid cell. As computational resources grow, there is a clear trend toward wider use of bin schemes, including their use as benchmarks to develop and test simplified bulk schemes. We argue that continuing on this path brings fundamental challenges difficult to overcome. The Lagrangian particle-based probabilistic approach is a practical alternative in which the myriad of cloud and precipitation particles present in a natural cloud is represented by a judiciously selected ensemble of point particles called superdroplets or superparticles. The advantages of the Lagrangian particle-based approach when compared to the Eulerian bin methodology are explained, and the prospects of applying the method to more comprehensive cloud simulations-for instance, targeting deep convection or frontal cloud systems-are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 672
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling wildlife resource selection: Can we do better?
    McDonald, LL
    Manly, BFJ
    [J]. MODELING IN NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: DEVELOPMENT INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION, 2001, : 137 - 145
  • [2] We can do better
    Gannon, Frank
    [J]. EMBO REPORTS, 2023, 24 (04)
  • [3] We Can Do Better
    Wilk, Kevin E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 44 (09): : 634 - 635
  • [4] Can We Do Better?
    Lee, Richard S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : 893 - 894
  • [5] CAN WE DO BETTER
    MAXWELL, RJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 51 (04) : 941 - 948
  • [6] WE CAN DO BETTER
    BRANDT, R
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 1994, 52 (02) : 3 - 3
  • [7] We Can Do Better
    Douglas, Kathy S.
    [J]. NURSING ECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (01): : 40 - 41
  • [8] WE CAN DO BETTER
    BURGESS, EM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 31 (03): : R7 - R8
  • [9] We can do better
    Baker, Reg
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2014, 56 (01) : 11 - 13
  • [10] Can We do Better?
    Marcello, Peter W.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (01) : 9 - 10