Response of ionosphere to the great geomagnetic storm of September 1998: Observation and modeling

被引:20
|
作者
Pirog, O. M. [1 ]
Polekh, N. M. [1 ]
Tashchilin, A. V. [1 ]
Romanova, E. B. [1 ]
Zherebtsov, G. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Solar Terr Phys, Moscow 117901, Russia
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
ionosphere; plasmasphere; atmosphere; ionospheric storm; geomagnetic disturbance; incoherent scatter; electron density; electron and ion temperature; numerical model of the ionosphere and plasmasphere;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.005
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
We present the results derived from investigating of the ionospheric effects of the great geomagnetic storm on September 24-27, 1998 based on analyzing the data obtained at ionospheric stations located in the region of Siberia and the Far East. For the sake of comparison we have also introduced the data from some European stations. In addition to the vertical-incidence sounding data the measurements from the Irkutsk incoherent scatter radar are used. It is obtained that the intense negative disturbances during the main phase of the storm are observed at all stations under investigation. A comparison of the foF2 variations for the two meridians shows that even with a relatively small difference of longitudes (45 degrees), the recovery phase has substantial differences of ionospheric disturbances. On September 26, the positive disturbances are observed and persist the following day at all stations except Salekhard and the Norilsk chain. At the Norilsk chain and at Salekhard the negative disturbances recurred after positive disturbances. The sign reversal of disturbance during the recovery phase extends over in the further displacement from the west to the east. An interpretation of the measurements includes their comparing with the results of calculations in terms of a numerical model of the ionosphere and plasmasphere. The modeling results are in the satisfied agreement with the measurements. According to the model calculations the sign of the ionospheric disturbance is changed from negative to positive as the result of combined effects of corpuscular and photo ionization. The sign of ionospheric disturbance is determined by a local time at which the magnetic storm has begun. (c) 2006 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1081 / 1087
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ionosphere data assimilation modeling of 2015 St. Patrick's Day geomagnetic storm
    Chen, C. H.
    Lin, C. H.
    Matsuo, T.
    Chen, W. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2016, 121 (11) : 11549 - 11559
  • [32] TRANSIENT-RESPONSE OF UNIFORM IONOSPHERE AND PRELIMINARY REVERSE IMPULSE OF GEOMAGNETIC STORM SUDDEN COMMENCEMENT
    KIKUCHI, T
    ARAKI, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 1979, 41 (09): : 917 - 925
  • [33] Ionosphere's F2-layer Response to 2006 Geomagnetic Storm at Ilorin, Nigeria
    Olawepo, A. O.
    Adeniyi, J. O.
    [J]. AFRICAN REVIEW OF PHYSICS, 2012, 7 : 277 - 281
  • [34] Perturbation electric fields and disturbance currents investigated during the 25 September 1998 great storm
    Horvath, Ildiko
    Lovell, Brian C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2014, 119 (10) : 8483 - 8498
  • [35] Impact of geomagnetic storm of September 7-8, 2017 on ionosphere and HF propagation: A multi-instrument study
    Blagoveshchensky, D. V.
    Sergeeva, M. A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (01) : 239 - 256
  • [36] Ionosphere response to geomagnetic storms on 7-8 September 2017 over Kharkiv (Ukraine)
    Katsko, S., V
    Emelyanov, L. Ya
    Domnin, I. F.
    Chernogor, L. F.
    [J]. 2020 XXXIIIRD GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF RADIO SCIENCE, 2020,
  • [37] Self-consistent modeling of the large-scale distortions in the geomagnetic field during the 24-27 September 1998 major magnetic storm
    Feldstein, YI
    Levitin, AE
    Kozyra, JU
    Tsurutani, BT
    Prigancova, A
    Alperovich, L
    Gonzalez, WD
    Mall, U
    Alexeev, II
    Gromova, LI
    Dremukhina, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2005, 110 (A11)
  • [38] RESPONSE OF THE THERMOSPHERE AND IONOSPHERE TO GEOMAGNETIC STORMS
    FULLERROWELL, TJ
    CODRESCU, MV
    MOFFETT, RJ
    QUEGAN, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1994, 99 (A3) : 3893 - 3914
  • [39] RESPONSE OF TOPSIDE IONOSPHERE TO GEOMAGNETIC STORMS
    MARUBASH.K
    TAYLOR, HA
    REBER, CA
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1974, 55 (04): : 379 - 379
  • [40] Energy dissipation during a geomagnetic storm: May 1998
    Pulkkinen, TI
    Ganushkina, NY
    Kallio, EI
    Lu, G
    Baker, DN
    Turner, NE
    Fritz, TA
    Fennell, JF
    Roeder, J
    [J]. ADVANCES IN GLOBAL MAGNETOSPHERIC STRUCTURE, DYNAMICS, AND REGION COUPLING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 30 (10): : 2231 - 2240