Understanding Carbon Footprint in Production and Use of Landscape Plants

被引:9
|
作者
Ingram, Dewayne L. [1 ]
Hall, Charles R. [2 ]
Knight, Joshua [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Hort, N-318 Agr Sci North, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Hort Sci, Int Floriculture, 2133 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
global warming potential; life cycle assessment; sustainability; variable costs; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PRODUCTION SYSTEM COMPONENTS; VARIABLE COSTS; WATER-USE; CONTAINER; IMPACT; TREE;
D O I
10.21273/HORTTECH04220-18
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Understanding carbon footprint (CF) terminology and the science underlying its determination is important to minimizing the negative impacts of new product development and assessing positive or negative cradle-to-grave life-cycle impacts. Life cycle assessment has been used to characterize representative field-grown and container-grown landscape plants. The dominant contributor to the CF and variable costs of field-grown trees is equipment use, or more specifically, the combustion of fossil fuels. Most of that impact is at harvest when heavy equipment is used to dig and move individual trees. Transport of these trees to customers and the subsequent transplant in the landscape are also carbon-intensive activities. Field-grown shrubs are typically dug by hand and have much smaller CFs than trees. Plastics are the major contributor to CF of container-grown plants. Greenhouse heating also can be impactful on the CF of plants depending on the location of the greenhouse or nursery and the length and season(s) of production. Knowing the input products and activities that contribute most toward CF and costs during plant production allows nursery and greenhouse managers to consider protocol modifications that are most impactful on profit potential and environmental impact. Marketers of landscape plants need information about the economic and environmental life-cycle benefits of these products, as they market to environmentally conscious consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 10
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrated assessment of the net carbon footprint of small hydropower plants
    Gomez-Gener, Lluis
    Gubau, Marina
    von Schiller, Daniel
    Marce, Rafael
    Obrador, Biel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [42] Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint of Greek Wastewater Treatment Plants
    Goliopoulos, Nikos
    Mamais, Daniel
    Noutsopoulos, Constantinos
    Dimopoulou, Argyri
    Kounadis, Christos
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [43] CARBON FOOTPRINT OF ELECTRICITY FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PLANTS IN ITALY
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Fiala, Marco
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 14 (07): : 1495 - 1502
  • [44] Changes in carbon footprint when integrating production of filamentous fungi in 1st generation ethanol plants
    Brancoli, Pedro
    Ferreira, Jorge A.
    Bolton, Kim
    Taherzadeh, Mohammad J.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 249 : 1069 - 1073
  • [45] Investigation of carbon footprint effect of renewable power plants regarding energy production: A case study of a city in Turkey
    Kerem, Alper
    [J]. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 2022, 72 (03): : 294 - 307
  • [46] Investigation of carbon footprint effect of renewable power plants regarding energy production: A case study of a city in Turkey
    Kerem, Alper
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2022, 72 (03) : 294 - 307
  • [47] Tourism landscape footprint in the archaeological landscape
    Zemla-Siesicka, Anna
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 103
  • [48] A Survey of the Multidisciplinary Team Understanding of the Impact of Inhalers on Carbon Footprint
    Green, S.
    Linehan, D.
    O'Callaghan, J.
    Wynne, C.
    Hurley, E.
    Owens, S.
    Allen, J.
    McDonald, M.
    O'Reilly, K. M. A.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (SUPPL 5) : 187 - 188
  • [49] Low-carbon footprint production of steam, electricity and activated carbon
    Thumbi, Charles K.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [50] Improved production efficiency in cattle to reduce their carbon footprint for beef production
    Scholtz, M. M.
    Steyn, Y.
    van Marle-Koester, E.
    Theron, H. E.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 42 (05) : 450 - 453