Improved production efficiency in cattle to reduce their carbon footprint for beef production

被引:12
|
作者
Scholtz, M. M. [1 ,2 ]
Steyn, Y. [3 ]
van Marle-Koester, E. [3 ]
Theron, H. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] ARC Anim Prod Inst, ZA-0062 Irene, South Africa
[2] Univ Orange Free State, ZA-9300 Bloemfontein, South Africa
[3] Univ Pretoria, Dept Anim & Wildlife Sci, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
Methane; global warming; greenhouse gas; crossbreeding; residual feed intake; feed efficiency; FEED-EFFICIENCY; ANGUS; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.4314/sajas.v42i5.1
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The FAO publication, Livestock's Long Shadow, indicated that livestock is responsible for 18% of the world's greenhouse gas production thereby creating the perception that livestock is a major cause of global warming. Methane (CH4) makes up 16% of total world gas emissions and is the second most important greenhouse gas (GHG) after carbon dioxide (CO2). Ruminants are important to mankind since most of the world's vegetation biomass is rich in fibre and only ruminants can convert this vegetation into high quality protein sources for human consumption. In spite of this important role of livestock, it is singled out as producing large quantities of GHG that contribute to climate change, since enteric fermentation is responsible for 28% of global CH4 emissions. However, the net effect from livestock is only a 4.5% contribution to GHG. The livestock industry should be aware of the effect of livestock on climate change and therefore it is important that mechanisms are put in place to mitigate this effect. The improvement of production efficiency through increased production per constant unit, crossbreeding and genetic improvement may be a cost effective and permanent way of reducing the carbon footprint of beef cattle.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 453
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of Genomic Tools to Improve Production Efficiency, Health Resilience and Carbon Footprint of Beef Production
    Basarab, John A.
    Li, Changxi
    Stothard, Paul
    Fitzsimmons, Carolyn J.
    Plastow, Graham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 90 - 90
  • [2] Evaluation of the Water Footprint of Beef Cattle Production in Nebraska
    Spore, Tyler
    Mekonnen, Mesfin
    Neale, Christopher
    Watson, Andrea K.
    MacDonald, James C.
    Erickson, Galen E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 142 - 142
  • [3] Understanding uncertainty in the carbon footprint of beef production
    Sykes, Alasdair J.
    Topp, Cairistiona F. E.
    Rees, Robert M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 234 : 423 - 435
  • [4] Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle
    Desjardins, Raymond L.
    Worth, Devon E.
    Verge, Xavier P. C.
    Maxime, Dominique
    Dyer, Jim
    Cerkowniak, Darrel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (12) : 3279 - 3301
  • [5] Strategies to improve the efficiency of beef cattle production
    McAllister, Tim A.
    Basarab, John
    Guan, Leluo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 : 183 - 183
  • [6] EFFICIENCY OF PRODUCTION AND COW SIZE IN BEEF CATTLE
    KRESS, DD
    HAUSER, ER
    CHAPMAN, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1969, 29 (03) : 373 - +
  • [7] Strategies to improve the efficiency of beef cattle production
    Terry, Stephanie A.
    Basarab, John A.
    Guan, Le Luo
    McAllister, Tim A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 101 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [8] INDIGENOUS CATTLE AND IMPROVED BEEF-PRODUCTION
    SCHOEMAN, SJ
    VENTER, JP
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1989, 85 (11) : 689 - 690
  • [9] Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems
    Stackhouse-Lawson, K. R.
    Rotz, C. A.
    Oltjen, J. W.
    Mitloehner, F. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 90 (12) : 4641 - 4655
  • [10] Antagonism in the carbon footprint between beef and dairy production systems
    Scholtz, M. M.
    du Toit, J.
    Neser, F. W. C.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 44 (05) : S17 - S20