Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes in Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve

被引:5
|
作者
Hecht, Sebastien [1 ]
Zenses, Anne-Sophie [1 ]
Bernard, Jeremy [1 ]
Tastet, Lionel [1 ]
Cote, Nancy [1 ]
Guimaraes, Leonardo de Freitas Campos [1 ]
Paradis, Jean-Michel [1 ]
Beaudoin, Jonathan [1 ]
O'Connor, Kim [1 ]
Bernier, Mathieu [1 ]
Dumont, Eric [1 ]
Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri [1 ]
Delarochelliere, Robert [1 ]
Mohammadi, Siamak [1 ]
Clavel, Marie-Annick [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ]
Salaun, Erwan [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Laval Univ, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Univ Laval, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Aortic bioprosthesis; Redo; -surgery; Structural valve deterioration; Transcatheter valve -in -valve; PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH; END-POINT DEFINITIONS; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN SOCIETY; IMPLANTATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDATIONS; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.shj.2022.100106
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to redo-surgical aortic valve replacement (Redo-SAVR) for the treatment of failed surgical aortic bioprostheses. However, the benefit of ViV-TAVR compared with Redo-SAVR remains debated with regard to short-term hemodynamic results and short-and long-term clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare short-term hemodynamic performance and long-term clinical outcomes of ViV-TAVR vs. Redo-SAVR in patients treated for surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve failure. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data prospectively collected in 184 patients who underwent Redo-SAVR or ViV-TAVR. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and after the procedure and analyzed in an echocardiography core laboratory using the new Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. An inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to compare the outcomes between both procedures. Results: ViV-TAVR showed lower rate of intended hemodynamic performance (39.2% vs. 67.7%, p < 0.001) at 30 days, which was essentially driven by a higher rate (56.2% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.001) of high residual gradient (mean transvalvular gradient >= 20 mm Hg). Despite a trend for higher 30-day mortality in the Redo-SAVR vs. ViV-TAVR group (8.7% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 3.70 [0.77-17.6]; p = 0.10), the long-term mortality was significantly lower (24.2% vs. 50.1% at 8 years; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.48 [0.26-0.91]; p = 0.03) in the Redo-SAVR group. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, Redo-SAVR remained significantly associated with reduced long-term mortality compared with ViV-TAVR (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.32 [0.22-0.46]; p < 0.001). Conclusions: ViV-TAVR was associated with a lower rate of intended hemodynamic performance and numerically lower mortality at 30 days but higher rates of long-term mortality compared with Redo-SAVR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Raschpichler, Matthias
    de Waha, Suzanne
    Holzhey, David
    Schwarzer, Guido
    Flint, Nir
    Kaewkes, Danon
    Braeuchle, T.
    Brauchle, Paul T.
    Dvir, Danny
    Makkar, Raj
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Thiele, Holger
    Borger, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (24):
  • [32] Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes
    Hirji, Sameer A.
    Percy, Edward D.
    Zogg, Cheryl K.
    Malarczyk, Alexandra
    Harloff, Morgan T.
    Yazdchi, Farhang
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (29) : 2747 - 2755
  • [33] Hemodynamic parameters in patients after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Wernly, B.
    Zappe, A. K.
    Lichtenauer, M.
    Fichtlscherer, S.
    Franz, M.
    Hoppe, U. C.
    Landmesser, U.
    Kim, W. K.
    Jung, C.
    Lauten, H. R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 1319 - 1319
  • [34] Early and Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Degeneration: Two Faces of the Same Medal
    Dokollari, Aleksander
    Cameli, Matteo
    Mandoli, Giulia Elena
    Kalra, Didar-Karan S.
    Poston, Robert
    Coku, Lindita
    Pernoci, Marjela
    Miri, Mirian
    Bonacchi, Massimo
    Gelsomino, Sandro
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (11) : 3223 - 3231
  • [35] Redo Mitral Valve Replacement After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement
    Tsukioka, Yusuke
    Jeevanandam, Valluvan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [36] Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Following 2 Surgical Aortic Valve Replacements
    Moubarak, Ghadi
    Gupta, Swapnil
    Ladner, Jonathan
    Kluis, Austin
    Banwait, Jasjit
    Dimaio, J. Michael
    Mack, Michael J.
    Szerlip, Molly I.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (11) : E013305
  • [37] Contemporary Outcome Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Replacement
    Demal, Till J.
    Gordon, Christopher
    Bhadra, Oliver D.
    Linder, Matthias
    Ludwig, Sebastian
    Grundmann, David
    Voigtlaender, Lisa
    Waldschmidt, Lara
    Schirmer, Johannes
    Schofer, Niklas
    Seiffert, Moritz
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Westermann, Dirk
    Conradi, Lenard
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 171 : 115 - 121
  • [38] Valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement versus redo-surgical mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nasir, Muhammad Moiz
    Amir, Suhaina
    Shahid, Ahmad
    Rehman, Wajeeh Ur
    Haris, Muhammad
    Ikram, Armeen
    Mubariz, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Jawad
    Khan, Ubaid
    Iqbal, Abdul Ghani
    Saeed, Hasham
    Noori, Muhammad Atif Masood
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 415
  • [39] Surgical aortic valve replacement vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation in octogenarians
    Jeger, R.
    Rueter, F.
    Leibundgut, G.
    Kaiser, C.
    Eckstein, F.
    Buser, P.
    Reuthebuch, O.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 955 - 955
  • [40] Hemodynamic outcomes after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-center experience
    Kherallah, R. Yazan
    Koneru, Srikanth
    Krajcer, Zvonimir
    Preventza, Ourania
    Dougherty, Kathryn G.
    McCormack, Melissa L.
    Costello, Briana T.
    Coulter, Stephanie
    Strickman, Neil E.
    Gomez, Juan Carlos Plana
    Mortazavi, Ali
    Diez, Jose G.
    Livesay, James J.
    Coselli, Joseph S.
    Silva, Guilherme, V
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 10 (05) : 630 - 640